Categories Culture
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
The entire chapter of 1 Nephi 20 in the #TheBookOfMormon is an altered text of the entire chapter of Isaiah 48 from the King James Version of the Bible. Here's a screenshot of the beginning of 1 Nephi 20.
Notice the textual similarities between 1 Nephi 20:1 [ https://t.co/agtlGhpMEJ ] and Isaiah 48:1 in the KJV [ https://t.co/gB5Qk3CFMU ]
Isaiah 48:1 (KJV) Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the Lord, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness.
1 Nephi 20:1 "Hearken and hear this, O house of Jacob, who are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, or out of the waters of baptism, ...
... who swear by the name of the Lord, and make mention of the God of Israel, yet they swear not in truth nor in righteousness."
Notice the textual similarities between 1 Nephi 20:1 [ https://t.co/agtlGhpMEJ ] and Isaiah 48:1 in the KJV [ https://t.co/gB5Qk3CFMU ]
Isaiah 48:1 (KJV) Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the Lord, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness.
1 Nephi 20:1 "Hearken and hear this, O house of Jacob, who are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, or out of the waters of baptism, ...
... who swear by the name of the Lord, and make mention of the God of Israel, yet they swear not in truth nor in righteousness."
How do you write a PAP in practice, especially in limited time?
Regardless of how you feel about @The_JOP’s new policy, a lot of political scientists will be writing PAPs for the first time.
I wanted to share my experiences/thoughts having written many PAPs.
Thread follows..🧵
1. What counts as a PAP? In my view, all that makes a PAP a PAP is that it pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, ideally as precisely as possible.
Note what this does *not* include: lit review, theory, etc.
Some people like to write PAPs that include all this, but...
..I do not think this is necessary. In my view, as long as your PAP pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, it’s a PAP, regardless of what else you may want to add to it. Add more if you want, but you don’t need to imo.
That means PAPs can be super short/fast to write.
2. How do you do this practically?
Idea 1: For people getting started, I highly recommend https://t.co/EbxOOIHr8Z. Screenshot attached. You’ll answer 6 questions about your analysis, each answer requires ~a few sentences. Should take you around 15 minutes. And that’s it!
The tool will create a) an anonymized PDF with your answers you can upload with a paper submission and b) a blinded link (eg https://t.co/hTHH0rb4wg) you can include that verifies you pre-registered. And you’re done!
There’s many more options. Here’s two more things I’ve done:
Regardless of how you feel about @The_JOP’s new policy, a lot of political scientists will be writing PAPs for the first time.
I wanted to share my experiences/thoughts having written many PAPs.
Thread follows..🧵
1. What counts as a PAP? In my view, all that makes a PAP a PAP is that it pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, ideally as precisely as possible.
Note what this does *not* include: lit review, theory, etc.
Some people like to write PAPs that include all this, but...
..I do not think this is necessary. In my view, as long as your PAP pre-specifies procedures for data analysis, it’s a PAP, regardless of what else you may want to add to it. Add more if you want, but you don’t need to imo.
That means PAPs can be super short/fast to write.
2. How do you do this practically?
Idea 1: For people getting started, I highly recommend https://t.co/EbxOOIHr8Z. Screenshot attached. You’ll answer 6 questions about your analysis, each answer requires ~a few sentences. Should take you around 15 minutes. And that’s it!
The tool will create a) an anonymized PDF with your answers you can upload with a paper submission and b) a blinded link (eg https://t.co/hTHH0rb4wg) you can include that verifies you pre-registered. And you’re done!
There’s many more options. Here’s two more things I’ve done:
United fans are mad if they don’t want Sancho. Those calling for Grealish over him need to assess how they fit into this current United side.
Grealish works if he replaces Pogba in the formation against Villa the other night. Otherwise he doesn’t fit #MUFC
Sancho at RW is the bigger need. Yes we have Diallo & Pellistri but neither are ready to start week in week out.
I love Grealish, he’s class. But unless you’re willing to shift Rashford permanently to RW, it doesn’t work.
We’ve also got VDB who can’t get a game right now #MUFC
United are better off buying a top DM with the money it will cost to sign Grealish.
Say Pogba leaves, the need is to bring in someone who can play deeper and can control the tempo of a game.
Neves is the obvious choice #MUFC
It’s so important that our next 3 signings are signings which move the needle and move United to serious challengers on all fronts.
Buying players that we are unsure where they fit into the current system is negligent and is the reason we’ve recruited so poorly #MUFC
The past 2 seasons we’ve recruited well, and it’s important we continue to do that.
Sancho still moves the needle and gives us a genuine RW. We saw AWB profit from a player holding his width more.
It also provides more balance to the attack #MUFC
Grealish works if he replaces Pogba in the formation against Villa the other night. Otherwise he doesn’t fit #MUFC
If I understand the Man UTD-fans\u2019 replies here today.....you don\u2019t want Sancho?
— Jan Aage Fjortoft \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 \U0001f1f3\U0001f1f4 (@JanAageFjortoft) January 3, 2021
You are ok with Liverpool taking him this summer?
Just asking...
Sancho at RW is the bigger need. Yes we have Diallo & Pellistri but neither are ready to start week in week out.
I love Grealish, he’s class. But unless you’re willing to shift Rashford permanently to RW, it doesn’t work.
We’ve also got VDB who can’t get a game right now #MUFC
United are better off buying a top DM with the money it will cost to sign Grealish.
Say Pogba leaves, the need is to bring in someone who can play deeper and can control the tempo of a game.
Neves is the obvious choice #MUFC
It’s so important that our next 3 signings are signings which move the needle and move United to serious challengers on all fronts.
Buying players that we are unsure where they fit into the current system is negligent and is the reason we’ve recruited so poorly #MUFC
The past 2 seasons we’ve recruited well, and it’s important we continue to do that.
Sancho still moves the needle and gives us a genuine RW. We saw AWB profit from a player holding his width more.
It also provides more balance to the attack #MUFC