0/ It's been a big 2 weeks for $BTC as it hits a new ATH, $MSTR completes a $650M convert, Mass Mutual invests $100M, Ruffer Management buys $745M, Jeffries recommends a 5% allocation, Guggenheim's CIO gives a $400K PT, OneRiver, FinCen rules better than feared & Coinbase S1

1/ $MSTR completed a $650M convertible bond offering at 0.75% with the intent to purchase $BTC (and per @michael_saylor) it looks like they completed that buy. Since first announcing their $BTC purchase in mid-August the stocks +143% (with BTC over 2.0x during that time)
2/ Mass Mutual with its ~$235B general investment account purchased $100M of $BTC through NYDIG (after making an equity investment alongside @BessemerVP & $MS).
3/ Ruffer Management a ~$27B asset manager bought $750M of $BTC to equate to ~2.5% of the portfolio:

"We see this BTC investment as a small but potent insurance policy against the continuing devaluation of the world’s major currencies,”
4/ Jefferies Christopher Wood amended his long-only asset allocation recommendation for pension funds cutting gold to 45% from 50% and initiating a 5% position in $BTC.
5/ Guggenheim CIO Scott Minerd claimed that the firms "fundamental work" shows $BTC should be worth ~$400,000.

"Bitcoin has a lot of the attributes of gold and at the same time has an unusual value in terms of transactions," Minerd told Bloomberg TV.
6/ OneRiver & Eric Peters aims to own ~$1.0B of $BTC & $ETH in early '21 and has reportedly acquired in excess of $600M already with the backing of Alan Howard.
7/ For the past few weeks the crypto community was worried about rules that would come out of FinCen & @stevenmnuchin1. They were better than feared not covering unhosted to unhosted wallets and puts $BTC on a similar footing to USD from a FI perspective.
8/ @coinbase has been executing a lot of these large buy orders for institutional investors / funds & has filed their S1 to go public. As they continue to take back volume from offshore exchanges and as CME grows it leads to the maturation of the market.
9/ This fact pattern is the biggest difference between now & '17 which was very much a retail driven frenzy. You are having multiple 9 figure $BTC spot orders placed in market when daily inflation is ~1/2 of what it was on top of a more conducive macro backdrop.
10/ All of this is in the last 2 weeks & excludes the $PYPL roll out, the success of $SQ, @DigitalAssets, new custodians, guidance from the OCC, macro investors like Druckenmiller & PTJ talking about $BTC's place in the portfolio, etc... will shape up for an interesting '21.

More from Crypto

2020 was a game changer for Ethereum.

The vast majority of its success was fueled by #DeFi.

Here's what happened in 5 Tweets 🔽

1) Governance Tokens 🪙

Projects gave complete ownership of billion dollar protocols to their users, often using retroactive airdrops.

Early adopters earned tokens for past usage, and token-based voting now dictates all technical


2) Liquidity Mining ⛏️

Power users were the first to earn on-going distribution by providing liquidity.

$COMP sparked the wave, with $BAL coining the term a few weeks


3) Yield Faming 🌾

Projects coupled liquidity mining and governance tokens to boost 'yields' by combining lending rates with an incentive layer.

APYs peaked as high as 1M% during 'DeFi summer', leading to a 'food coin' craze like $YAM and


4) Fair Launches ✅

Who needs investment when you can launch using yield farming?

@iearnfinance debuted $YFI with no formal funding, seeding a community treasury for self-sustainability.

The notion of a core team and community became one and the
1/ @MIT discussing the need for blockchain gateways to achieve interoperability across different blockchain networks, and to support the cross-blockchain mobility of virtual assets

https://t.co/PbjQkSlTT3

@quant_network are collaborating with MIT in the creation of ODAP

$QNT

2/ "In order for blockchain-based services to scale globally, blockchain networks must be able to interoperate with one another following a standardized protocol and interfaces (APIs)"

Gilbert founded ISO TC307 which 60 countries are working towards standardizing the interfaces


3/ "We believe that a blockchain gateway is needed for blockchain networks to interoperate in a manner similar
to border gateway routers in IP networks. Just as border gateway routers use the BGPv4 protocol to interact with one another in a peered fashion we believe that a...

4/ blockchain gateway protocol will be needed to permit the movement of virtual assets and related information across blockchain networks in a secure and privacy-preserving manner"

You can read more about the gateway protocol ODAP in this 21 tweet


5/
"We motivate the need for blockchain gateways and blockchain gateway protocols in the following summary:

✅Enables blockchain interoperability:
Blockchain gateways provide an interface for the interoperability between blockchain/DLT systems that operate distinct consensus...

You May Also Like

One of the most successful stock trader with special focus on cash stocks and who has a very creative mind to look out for opportunities in dark times

Covering one of the most unique set ups: Extended moves & Reversal plays

Time for a 🧵 to learn the above from @iManasArora

What qualifies for an extended move?

30-40% move in just 5-6 days is one example of extended move

How Manas used this info to book


Post that the plight of the


Example 2: Booking profits when the stock is extended from 10WMA

10WMA =


Another hack to identify extended move in a stock:

Too many green days!

Read
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.