The #STABLEAct is a confused attempt at regulating perceived harms that are not actually caused by the technology, but are, ironically, inherent in the existing financial system that cryptocurrencies are designed to replace

👇🏽

Stablecoins, by their nature, can only INCREASE access to financial services. Unlike the existing system, they do not require the use of a bank account

The existence of stablecoins does not prevent consumers from using any other traditional payment, savings or credit offerings
In contrast, people can and do lose access to financial services when banks freeze or close their accounts

This happens when banks make arbitrary and opaque risk decisions that are in turn based on cumbersome regulations which deputize banks to do the government’s job
According to the press release

1. Stablecoin issuers could take advantage of low income consumers
2. Stablecoins are an ‘outsourced issuance’ of US dollars
3. Stablecoins pose market, liquidity, and credit risk

But all of these concerns are misplaced👇🏽

https://t.co/g997ym8zCV
The press release compares stablecoins to ‘shadow banks’ e.g mortgage & payday lenders, that lend on a fractional reserve basis, and often take advantage of consumers

This is the opposite of stablecoins like USDC, which are fully collateralized and don't charge interest or fees
It is reasonable to want to ensure fair lending & credit practices, but the existing lending laws should be clarified or expanded to cover lending in stablecoins

This objective does not justify regulating the issuance or transactional use of stablecoins
Second, stablecoins such as USDC also do not represent an 'issuance' of US Dollars

They are, at most, the issuance of a promise to redeem 1 stablecoin for 1 US Dollar, the same way as a check or money order

This issuance is already regulated under state money transmission laws
Finally, the concerns about 'market, credit, and liquidity risks' are vague and poorly articulated

Perhaps they refer to the risk that stablecoins could become 'too big to fail' or somehow cause a 2008 style financial crisis, which of course is absurd...
...because, again, stablecoins do not inherently involve any credit or fractional reserve

And again, there are existing laws (state money transmission) which require issuers of stablecoins to have fully collateralized reserves with a 1:1 backing.
There are also some very concerning sections in the draft, most notably this one, which would regulate:

"any stablecoin-related commercial activity, including activity involving stablecoins issued by other persons, without obtaining written approval"
All of this is to say, the #STABLEact is overly broad and poorly targeted

Under the premise of financial inclusion, it will do nothing to protect consumers, but will concentrate more power in banks, reduce competition and ultimately reduce financial inclusion

More from Crypto

2020 was a game changer for Ethereum.

The vast majority of its success was fueled by #DeFi.

Here's what happened in 5 Tweets 🔽

1) Governance Tokens 🪙

Projects gave complete ownership of billion dollar protocols to their users, often using retroactive airdrops.

Early adopters earned tokens for past usage, and token-based voting now dictates all technical


2) Liquidity Mining ⛏️

Power users were the first to earn on-going distribution by providing liquidity.

$COMP sparked the wave, with $BAL coining the term a few weeks


3) Yield Faming 🌾

Projects coupled liquidity mining and governance tokens to boost 'yields' by combining lending rates with an incentive layer.

APYs peaked as high as 1M% during 'DeFi summer', leading to a 'food coin' craze like $YAM and


4) Fair Launches ✅

Who needs investment when you can launch using yield farming?

@iearnfinance debuted $YFI with no formal funding, seeding a community treasury for self-sustainability.

The notion of a core team and community became one and the

You May Also Like

1. Project 1742 (EcoHealth/DTRA)
Risks of bat-borne zoonotic diseases in Western Asia

Duration: 24/10/2018-23 /10/2019

Funding: $71,500
@dgaytandzhieva
https://t.co/680CdD8uug


2. Bat Virus Database
Access to the database is limited only to those scientists participating in our ‘Bats and Coronaviruses’ project
Our intention is to eventually open up this database to the larger scientific community
https://t.co/mPn7b9HM48


3. EcoHealth Alliance & DTRA Asking for Trouble
One Health research project focused on characterizing bat diversity, bat coronavirus diversity and the risk of bat-borne zoonotic disease emergence in the region.
https://t.co/u6aUeWBGEN


4. Phelps, Olival, Epstein, Karesh - EcoHealth/DTRA


5, Methods and Expected Outcomes
(Unexpected Outcome = New Coronavirus Pandemic)
These 10 threads will teach you more than reading 100 books

Five billionaires share their top lessons on startups, life and entrepreneurship (1/10)


10 competitive advantages that will trump talent (2/10)


Some harsh truths you probably don’t want to hear (3/10)


10 significant lies you’re told about the world (4/10)