$USOIL
A quick thread š§µ
Daily TF
With the turn-around in price from the initial harmonic pattern, Consequent LH-LL's in place.
Below $101.56, We might catch sight of $87 followed by $78 https://t.co/nvzolftng6
$USOIL
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) June 6, 2022
With the inching up of reaction lows, the targets are placed at $125 and $134.
In a different case scenario, Let's not rule out the possibility- If the price continues to sustain above the level of $104, Might see a hit towards the level of $150 as well. #CrudeOil pic.twitter.com/p52TnRkBqC
More from Gurleen
Once again Above 6342.80; ATH š 6477.45
View intact- Sustenance above 6342.80 for the upcoming sessions would trigger new highs towards the channel top.
#StockMarket #StocksToWatch https://t.co/wNH5bJ8oi2
#BAJFINANCE
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 29, 2021
Breaking past the previous ATH;
Sustenance above 6342.80 would bring in new highs towards the channel top. #StockMarket #StockToWatch pic.twitter.com/ID8Q3QdFEf
More from Crudeoillongterm
On the last two instances, when #Brent #CrudeOil crossed 90, NIFTY (in Blue - Left scale) underwent Correction both the times. This is the third such instance.
— Piyush Chaudhry (@piyushchaudhry) February 12, 2022
Below 90, NIFTY & Brent have had positive correlation, with 90 acting as an inflection point & causing the Divergence. pic.twitter.com/Q9dj8YFpuV
Needs to break below this level for real impact. https://t.co/r5KoExzFKc
NYMEX Crude Oil update !
— Professor (@DillikiBiili) July 1, 2022
Its not ready to come below US$ 100 which is a big psychological level ! Everytime it comes near that zone, it takes a bounce. https://t.co/xQ3dZZXNiu pic.twitter.com/7WS38JU6JF
Interesting Derivatives Dataā¦
#MarketsWithETNOW | Is the #crude concern overblown? What do the charts indicate? What will be the trend going forward? Watch to find out as @kbbothra analyses #Brent #Crude #Oil #StockMarket pic.twitter.com/4SBSfpiKmd
— ET NOW (@ETNOWlive) June 1, 2022
You May Also Like
Week 1 highlights: getting shortlisted for YC W2019š¤, acquiring a premium domainš°, meeting Substack's @hamishmckenzie and Stripe CEO @patrickc š¤©
2/ So what is Brew?
brew / bru : / to make (beer, coffee etc.) / verb: begin to develop š±
A place for you to enjoy premium content while supporting your favorite creators. Sort of like a āConsumer-facing Patreonā cc @jackconte
(weāre still working on the pitch)
3/ So, why be so transparent? Two words: launch strategy.
jk š a) I loooove doing something consistently for a long period of time b) limited downside and infinite upside (feedback, accountability, reach).
cc @altimor, @pmarca
4/ https://t.co/GOQJ7LjQ2t domain š»
It started with a cold email. Guess what? He was using BuyMeACoffee on his blog, and was excited to hear about what we're building next. Within 2w, we signed the deal at @Escrowcom's SF office. Youāre a pleasure to work with @MichaelCyger!
5/ @ycombinator's invite for the in-person interview arrived that evening. Quite a day!
Thanks @patio11 for the thoughtful feedback on our YC application, and @gabhubert for your directions on positioning the product ā set the tone for our pitch!
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thingāphysical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?