Weekly #CrudeOil chart
The #commodity now has formed a descending triangle
Price now bear 200 DMA
sustaining above 93 , it may rise towards 118 as shown,
below 93, likely to drop towards 58 over the winter (economic slowdown scenario)
#OOTT #Bidenflation #inflation
More from Techno Prince
More from Crudeoillongterm
$USOIL
A quick thread 🧵
Daily TF
With the turn-around in price from the initial harmonic pattern, Consequent LH-LL's in place.
Below $101.56, We might catch sight of $87 followed by $78 https://t.co/nvzolftng6
On the Weekly TF, If the price slips and closes below $92.96, the target would be $70.
A quick thread 🧵
Daily TF
With the turn-around in price from the initial harmonic pattern, Consequent LH-LL's in place.
Below $101.56, We might catch sight of $87 followed by $78 https://t.co/nvzolftng6
$USOIL
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) June 6, 2022
With the inching up of reaction lows, the targets are placed at $125 and $134.
In a different case scenario, Let's not rule out the possibility- If the price continues to sustain above the level of $104, Might see a hit towards the level of $150 as well. #CrudeOil pic.twitter.com/p52TnRkBqC
On the Weekly TF, If the price slips and closes below $92.96, the target would be $70.
Crude Oil forming bottom at US$ 100 for now, which is a big psychological level.
Needs to break below this level for real impact. https://t.co/r5KoExzFKc
Needs to break below this level for real impact. https://t.co/r5KoExzFKc
NYMEX Crude Oil update !
— Professor (@DillikiBiili) July 1, 2022
Its not ready to come below US$ 100 which is a big psychological level ! Everytime it comes near that zone, it takes a bounce. https://t.co/xQ3dZZXNiu pic.twitter.com/7WS38JU6JF
You May Also Like
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Ivor Cummins BE (Chem) is a former R&D Manager at HP (sourcre: https://t.co/Wbf5scf7gn), turned Content Creator/Podcast Host/YouTube personality. (Call it what you will.)
— Steve (@braidedmanga) November 17, 2020
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq