Breaking Thread: D5 MEMORY LANE & OUTLOOK
In this thread we will cover the different meanings behind D5 and what the near term might have in store for us.

D5 Multiple Meanings & Outlook:
1. Events that took place on 5th Dec 2018
2. Date of DNI Report regarding unmaski*g of Gen. Flynn.
3. CF Investigation re: Crim*s Against Humanity
4. D5 Forecast 432Hz (Ongoing Investigation re: Election Frau*)
1. Lets warm up with 2 Year Delta Drop 2549:
Role of Huber (as portrayed by 'Q')? What are the odds that Huber would be scheduled to testify re: Clint*n Foundation on D5? What are the odds GHWB passes away and the State Funeral date is on D5? What other interviews and
investigations were wiped clean (postponed) given a STATE FUNERAL takes up media coverage for a week? Why does the FAKE NEWS media [largest in the world] continually attack 'Q'? Why is the WASH POST leading the attack? Think ABC agency. When you are awake you can SEE CLEARLY.
My take: DS tried to cover up Huber BOOM via Funeral Date, but they didn’t realise D5 meant something else…👇
2. Now we move to D5 marker on May 5th 2020 (D5), with Drop 4229
D5 date on the ODNI release… [They] thought it meant Dec [5] _State Funeral. NSA A lot more coming [soon].
My take: DECLAS re: unmasking of Flynn provided additional evidence that FISA was a coordinated attempt to keep Flynn from bringing the PAIN.
3. Lets dive into Huber Report on CF and Crim*s Against Humanity, Drop 3361 Many were disappointed w/ H report when released. Just because the 'public' isn't aware of something… D5
Check out page 294 https://t.co/ArtZhEdFAQ
My take: D5 refers to further DECLAS regarding CF investigation, this investigation is this ongoing and there’s a lot more taking place behind the scenes... 👇
4. Which takes me to D5 Forecast 432Hz: Leveraging SNOW WHITE Thread (Part 2), I believe D5 will connect Dominion Software used in Haita Elections, with CF and the Weiner Laptop, in line with latest DECLAS evidence:
Remember, The scope of the Hilla*y Clint*n email investigation was so private, the OIG didn't have the security clearances needed to view the emails. And, the emails couldn't be given to Congress. HAMM*R & SCORECA*D Software?
The KnockOut - Drop 1979 “What if access to the serv*r(s) was deliberate? What if this is 'known' within the intelligence community?"
What if this is 'known' within the FBI & DOJ?” “WHY WAS THE INFORMATION ON WEIN*R'S LAPTOP IN THE FIRST PLACE? D5.”
Perhaps these Servers where used to R*g Electi*ns? ‘’Reconcile. 1 = 1? 1 = 0? Evidence of an ongoing investigation…..’’ 1=0 AS IN TRU*P V*TE FLIP*ED TO BID*N?
EVIDENCE OF AN ONGOING INVESTIGATION... Remember Lin Wood Mentioned This Was Ongoing for Over 20 Years, and Sidney also Confirmed THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING, Foreign Leaders Know...
THE END, ENJOY THE SHOW.

More from Crime

You May Also Like

My top 10 tweets of the year

A thread 👇

https://t.co/xj4js6shhy


https://t.co/b81zoW6u1d


https://t.co/1147it02zs


https://t.co/A7XCU5fC2m
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".