Senior counsel Shyam Divan begins arguments on behalf of Shapoorji Pallonji group.
@tatatrusts @TataCompanies
TATA v MISTRY [Day 6]
Hearing to resume before Supreme Court in a short while from now.
@tatatrusts
@TataCompanies
#SupremeCourt
Senior counsel Shyam Divan begins arguments on behalf of Shapoorji Pallonji group.
@tatatrusts @TataCompanies
This case is about corporate governance. We have moved from corporate democracy to a much richer corporate governance under the amended Companies Act: Divan
@tatatrusts
The management of company is the board. The most crucial obligation imposed on Director now is that the director is a fiduciary. A fiduciary's allegiance is to the company alone: Divan
#SupremeCourt #tatasons
Lack of probity is much broader than financial irregularities.
The long relationship between the two groups developed over decades. It developed in the context of a statutory framework which restricted the role of private trust: Divan.
There was a beach of articles in the removal of Cyrus Mistry: Divan
#tatasons #tatamistry
Management has to be by the board as per the articles and the statute.
Termination of managing director has to be by a resolution. The same process as is followed for appointment has to be followed: Divan
Section 166 is very very important. It lays down duties of Directors.
If you are torn between allegiance to company and allegiance to something else, then you cannot act as a Director: Divan.
Director cannot abdicate or yield on his/her independent judgment. Director may consult or take advice but has to act independently and cannot be compelled or coerced: Divan
Two directors had praised Mistry for his performance as Executive Chairperson four months before his removal. Those two directors did not even file their response explaining their conduct: Divan.
#tatavmisrty #tata #mistry
Supreme Court says it is intending to make certain observations on the procedure to be followed by tribunals. This was in the context of whether plea before NCLAT should have been amended by way of amendment applications or additional affidavits.
@tatatrusts
The selection of Tata Sons chairperson is crucial. It affects so many companies and stakeholders across countries and continents: Divan
#SupremeCourt #tatasons #mistry
Ratan Tata is not subject to the discipline under Section 166 of the Companies Act. He ceased of be board member in December 2012 and did not attended a single board meeting till October 2016: Divan
Shyam Divan reading case laws on corporate governance and fiduciary duties of Director stating how the Companies Act moved from corporate majority to corporate governance.
Divan says TATA Trusts could not vote on its own shares between 1964 and 2000 due to statutory restrictions and it was a public trustee appointed by Central government who could vote on your shares: Divan
That was when Shapoorji Pallonji because of their relationship with Tata became a reliable partner who could vote and that is why Tata sold their shares to SPG. This continued till public trustee mandate was done away with in 2000 and Tata Trusts could vote : Divan
Divan giving history of Shapoorji Pallonji group's relationship with TATA group and how various SP group persons served on board of various Tata group companies.
The relationship is 5 decades old of which 4 was during public trustee regime: Divan
@TataCompanies
The relationship was of one utmost trust and good faith. The only thing we asked for was a place on the board which is recognised under Companies Act of 2013: Divan
Hence, the removal of Mistry was illegal, oppressive and against good faith and trust which Tata and Shapoorji Pallonji group shared: Divan
@tatatrusts
@TataCompanies
#SupremeCourt #tatasons
Bench rises for the day. Hearing to continue tomorrow.
#SupremeCourt #tatasons
@tatatrusts @TataCompanies @RNTata2000
More from Bar & Bench
More from Court
so @tedwheeler did you hear? today we are discussing "public whippings" thanks to @JamesBuchal
its a great chance to study the history of public beatings.
understandably, women feel threatened. https://t.co/jck05JGM4B
#PDX #tourism
FIRST OREGON WIFE-BEATER TO RECEIVE WHIPPING POST PUNISHMENT
https://t.co/3SJOODbuLf
PORTLAND. Or., June 7—The whipping post law passed at the last session of the Legislature was Into execution for the first time today, the victim being Charles Mcdlnty, convicted of wlfe-beatlng
whip was a braided blacksnake, made of rawhide, with four lashes. ..hustled to jail, stripped to the
waist, manacled, and his hands tied to the door high above his head. The whipping was as severe as the powerful deputy was capable of administering. Blood drawn on the 4th blow.
its a great chance to study the history of public beatings.
understandably, women feel threatened. https://t.co/jck05JGM4B
#PDX #tourism
@MultCoDA https://t.co/GgR1rCGIdG @OregonStateBar @BrentWeisberg @USAO_OR
— braingarbage (@braingarbage) November 28, 2020
Even if this is a "joke" or a drunk tweet, it appears that he is inciting gender-based violence on a woman via Twitter@twittersupport pic.twitter.com/TcaBiQ2wvU
FIRST OREGON WIFE-BEATER TO RECEIVE WHIPPING POST PUNISHMENT
https://t.co/3SJOODbuLf
PORTLAND. Or., June 7—The whipping post law passed at the last session of the Legislature was Into execution for the first time today, the victim being Charles Mcdlnty, convicted of wlfe-beatlng
whip was a braided blacksnake, made of rawhide, with four lashes. ..hustled to jail, stripped to the
waist, manacled, and his hands tied to the door high above his head. The whipping was as severe as the powerful deputy was capable of administering. Blood drawn on the 4th blow.
You May Also Like
H was always unseen in S2NL :)
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Sir, Log yahan.. 13 days patience nhi rakh sakte aur aap 2013 ki baat kar rahe ho. Even Aap Ready made portfolio banakar bhi de do to bhi wo 1 month me hi EXIT kar denge \U0001f602
— BhavinKhengarSuratGujarat (@IntradayWithBRK) September 19, 2021
Neuland 2700 se 1500 & Sequent 330 to 230 kya huwa.. 99% retailers/investors twitter par charcha n EXIT\U0001f602
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
