Want to start with SQL? It can be your first step into the programming world!

Top resources for SQL! 🧵👇

1⃣ SQL Course by DataCamp
Only 4 hours long!

Link: https://t.co/F2J548jxi4
2⃣ SQL Course by KhanAcademy
The course covers basic to advanced topics.

Link: https://t.co/AuZO59I2TL
3⃣ SQL by W3Schools
This is a SQL resource that you will turn to time and again. It covers everything you can learn about SQL.

Link: https://t.co/66b9YOlJ5J
4⃣ SQL by FreeCodeCamp
Beginner-friendly SQL Course.
4 hours long tutorial only!

Link: https://t.co/ILETXhWU4f
5⃣ SQL by Edureka
Amazing SQL course that covers all the basics to get you started.

Link: https://t.co/NM64rKwq4j
6⃣ Introduction to Databases and SQL Querying
No pre-requisite is required, and it is beginner friendly!

Link: https://t.co/KoEtryfJT7
7⃣ I have also created a beginner-friendly thread for anyone who wants to learn SQL.

Link: https://t.co/X6s1vqMQjA
If you like my efforts, please follow me and retweet the first tweet to spread the knowledge.

Happy Learning! 🔥💯

More from Coding

These 5 visualizers will help you learn data structures and algorithms up to 10 times faster

Thread 🧵👇🏻

1⃣
https://t.co/H2sKWKEeaz

- Learn DSA and visualize some complex programs. Definitely check it out.


2️⃣ https://t.co/0WcFTWBfh9

- Dedicated to graph DS


3️⃣ https://t.co/ShEQQkjtWD

- Visualizing data structures and algorithms through animation


4️⃣ https://t.co/XxzwBa3vvZ

- All sorting algorithms animations

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?