🇨🇳 🇨🇳 Situation Update, Dec. 6th –China owns DOMINION, and controls all the officials who run the machines at every level of government.

✅ Dominion is owned by communist China,which also runs the tech giants, the left-wing media and most of the Democrats in Congress
[M. Adams]

1. “Dominion’s Parent Company Arranges $400 Million Placement 1 Month Before Election: SEC Filing” – The Epoch Times:

https://t.co/vBLuPfoKAF
2. A filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shows that UBS Securities LLC arranged a private placement of $400 million with Staple Street Capital III, L.P. on October 8, 2020.

Staple Street Capital, a private equity firm located in New York, purchased
3. Dominion Voting systems on July 17, 2018, for an undisclosed amount.

The securities firm that arranged the transaction, UBS Securities LLC, is a division of UBS Americas Inc, which ultimately falls under UBS Group AG, a company listed on the SIX Swiss stock exchange.
4. Three of four board members of UBS Securities LLC are Chinese according to Bloomberg, at least one of whom appears to reside in Hong Kong.

One of them is Ye Xiang, a Chinese national who also served as a board member of the Beijing-based UBS subsidiary.
5. This facilitator of the deal is Chinese vice premier Wang Qishan, who is deemed the most finance-savvy Communist official. He was the mayor of Beijing in 2006 when he met with UBS’s then-chairman Marcel Ospel.

👉 Sidney Powell on a Newsmax interview, about timing:
6. "Well actually with the fraud case, December 8th, the deadline doesn’t comply. We have at least until December 14th. We might file more suits but a court in Michigan and Wisconsin today just gave us a great order recognizing that. These are not pure election contest we
7. are fighting, these are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of the election due to this fraud at any time."

👉 The Amistad Project, via TET, about artificial deadlines of Dec. 8th and 14th:

The Amistad Project has also filed litigation in several key swing
8. states, arguing that illegal actions on the part of state and local officials led to more than 1.2 million potentially fraudulent ballots. “Through rigorous investigations supporting our litigation, we demonstrate that state and local officials brazenly violated election
9. laws in several swing states in order to advance a partisan political agenda,” said Phill Kline, director of The Amistad Project, in a statement. “As a result, it is impossible for those states to determine their presidential electors in line with the arbitrary deadline set
10. forth via federal statute in 1948, and thus, the only deadline that matters is Jan. 20, 2021.”
[M. Adams]
@threadreaderapp unroll please

More from Warren C.🇺🇸 45th POTUS = G.O.A.T. 🇺🇸 ✝️

More from China

THREAD: Last week, China’s Cabinet announced that, for the first time, fees will be charged for “excessive” freedom of information requests, potentially meaning huge out-of-pocket expenses for lawyers and others who rely heavily on public information from the Chinese government.

According to a notice published Dec. 1, government offices will be able to choose from two different rate schemes: one based on frequency, one based on size.
https://t.co/KxUSE3dXEu


The “size” route is especially problematic. Here’s why:

If you’re an activist or a lawyer seeking a copy of an 800-page environmental impact assessment report, it’s going to cost you around $4,000 under this scheme.

In the past, disclosure requests were essentially free in China because there were no rules for charging fees.

In fact, last December an administrative agency in Shenzhen was ordered to reimburse an applicant after sending him a pay-on-delivery parcel.

According to the State Council’s Dec. 1 notice, the aim of adding the fees isn’t to generate revenue, but to “guide applicants to exercise their rights reasonably.”

Regardless of intention, however, the new costs will likely be a hindrance to those seeking public information.

You May Also Like

Following @BAUDEGS I have experienced hateful and propagandist tweets time after time. I have been shocked that an academic community would be so reckless with their publications. So I did some research.
The question is:
Is this an official account for Bahcesehir Uni (Bau)?


Bahcesehir Uni, BAU has an official website
https://t.co/ztzX6uj34V which links to their social media, leading to their Twitter account @Bahcesehir

BAU’s official Twitter account


BAU has many departments, which all have separate accounts. Nowhere among them did I find @BAUDEGS
@BAUOrganization @ApplyBAU @adayBAU @BAUAlumniCenter @bahcesehirfbe @baufens @CyprusBau @bauiisbf @bauglobal @bahcesehirebe @BAUintBatumi @BAUiletisim @BAUSaglik @bauebf @TIPBAU

Nowhere among them was @BAUDEGS to find