Apologies for tweeting about European Land so much yesterday, but this article was a significant moment for us. For more than 3.5 years we have suffered enormously and this has mostly gone under the radar in the

2/ The Times article is the first recognition of the Reubens involvement in the cladding scandal. From the time we discovered we had ACM, European Land has refused to contribute a single penny towards the remediation. Even after their own intrusive survey showed that the missing
3/ fire breaks and flammable insulation they installed were AGAINST regulations, they still refused to contribute to fix their mistakes.
4/ To make things worse, their aggressive behaviour meant they issued S20 notices against leaseholders and started billing us for millions from as early as 2018 (two years before any remediation works had even started). They then instructed their lawyers to take actions against
5/ against leaseholders and started proceedings against us if payments of £40,000-60,000 were not made within months. The stress and misery this caused us we will never forget or forgive.
6/ Even after the ACM government fund was announced, they instructed their lawyers to write to us and say they would continue to collect monies regardless and that we were not entitled to any refunds or interest. Only though intervention by MHCLG did they back track
7/ As of today they have collected £7.5m from leaseholders and none of this money has been returned to us despite this being a condition of both the ACM and BSF grants and the managing agent confirming we would be refunded.
8/ European Land have donated £2.5m to the conservatives and £80m to Oxford University since Grenfell, yet since won’t pay a penny towards our now £20.7m remediation costs. They expect tax payers and leaseholder to bail them out despite the Reubens being worth £16B.
9/ Meanwhile leaseholders have haemorrhaged money – in addition to the £7.5m in remediation costs, we have paid over £1m in waking watch and alarms, and our insurance premiums have soared from £130k to £670k this year. All industries profiteering from this scandal.
10/ So thank you to @thetimes for finally picking up on this story. And as always were are indebted to Will and Ritu @ukcag for their support. We will not stop campaigning with everyone until all homes are safe #EndOurCladdingScandal
To find out more: https://t.co/ufZCiqEjSG

More from Business

Should we go into the details of these 125 years?


SA is built on the exploitation of labour. That labour has functioned on alcohol unfortunately. Very few people consume liquor purely for enjoyment unfortunately. When SAB opened its doors 1895 workers were paid in alcohol- the dop/tot system. 2 years into SAB's establishment

The Prohibition Act is introduced. This means black people are barred from buying your wines, beer etc. So SAB's products are exclusively for white people. But during this period beer brewing by Black women is the norm. Ayinxilisi ncam ke this type of beer. Apparently it had some

Nutritious elements to it. Now some of the context around drinking culture during this time is migrant labour to the mines, further land dispossession, the Anglo-Boer Wars, Rhodes corruption (our first state capture commission if you will) which leads to his resignation.

This context plays a role in how our cities and small towns are constructed, how they lead to the confinement and surveillance yabantu. Traditional beer brewing is identified as a threat because buy now mining bosses have identified that there's money to be made here.

You May Also Like