I'm leery as fuck about Biden but Jesus at this point it's fucking stunning to have someone without an overt psychological pathology as the President.
Remember that shit he was doing with the Census? He fucked it up because he just declared something and left it to others to figure out how. It's not happening.
It's been this constant farce of horrors.
Place tariffs and demand negotiation.
Wait, no, they implement their own tariffs. MORE TARIFFS THEN.
Shit they still aren't negotiating and now to keep the farmers from revolting we did a socialism shit fuck shit
At least by pissing off NATO there's a whole lot of countries that would be willing to extradite ...
It's stunning to think he sat in office for four years and his only major legislative accomplishment was making rich people richer with his tax plan
— Anthony (@APope45) January 17, 2021
He's just all id, all the time, screaming and farting and jerking himself off through life.
The best solution would be to change labor law and end the practice of tipping in the United States altogether.
It's a half-measure, but it's what we're getting and I hope it helps someone. https://t.co/NmIJIvEcon
His stimulus package seems really good. Ending subminimum wages for tipped workers is pretty huge.
— Matticus\U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@Stoutstone) January 17, 2021
Agreed, but that seems like a tough sell.
— Matticus\U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@Stoutstone) January 17, 2021
We need someone who will be willing to get dirty, to pull hair and kick nuts. That's our only hope of keeping them down.
I don't think Biden's that guy. I guess we'll see. https://t.co/touFFoMSPa
The problem with incompetent authoritarian coups is that they're generally followed by competent ones.
— nobue (@nobue_weh) January 17, 2021
2024's gonna be bad.
More from Biden
Biden clearly should not do #1. The problem with #2 is that reconciliation delays the inevitable and creates a tiered system where issues that happen to be ineligible - like civil rights and democracy reform - are relegated to second-class status and left to die by filibuster.
This👇is the danger. By using reconciliation you’re conceding the point that major legislation deserves to pass by majority vote, but only certain kinds for arbitrary reasons. Plus the process itself is opaque and ugly. You risk laying a logistical & political trap for yourself.
All the “here’s what you can do through reconciliation” takes are correct but also look through the wrong end of the telescope. Any of the items mentioned, or a small number of them, would be relatively easy. But putting them all together in one leadership-driven mega package...
... with no committee involvement and no real oversight, enduring tough press for jamming a massive package through a close process and stories about lobbyist giveaways while dodging the adverse parliamentary rulings that are virtually inevitable and still maintaining 50 votes...
It’s possible! Maybe the mega-ness of the package ends up helping hold 50 votes. But the ugliness of the process is being underpriced. And to what end? You’re just delaying the inevitable since you can’t use it for civil rights nor can you allow civil rights to die by filibuster.
Biden will have two options:
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) January 23, 2021
1. Cut the price tag sharply to court GOP support.
2. Use reconciliation to do what he can with 50 votes\u2014some stuff has to go, like $15 wage.
(A 3rd option is nuke the filibuster but @PressSec says he doesn\u2019t favor that.)https://t.co/AV49BcmDaI
This👇is the danger. By using reconciliation you’re conceding the point that major legislation deserves to pass by majority vote, but only certain kinds for arbitrary reasons. Plus the process itself is opaque and ugly. You risk laying a logistical & political trap for yourself.
Obvious answer is 2b where you tie yourself in knots trying to go nuclear lite and totally lose the plot in the process
— Liam Donovan (@LPDonovan) January 23, 2021
All the “here’s what you can do through reconciliation” takes are correct but also look through the wrong end of the telescope. Any of the items mentioned, or a small number of them, would be relatively easy. But putting them all together in one leadership-driven mega package...
... with no committee involvement and no real oversight, enduring tough press for jamming a massive package through a close process and stories about lobbyist giveaways while dodging the adverse parliamentary rulings that are virtually inevitable and still maintaining 50 votes...
It’s possible! Maybe the mega-ness of the package ends up helping hold 50 votes. But the ugliness of the process is being underpriced. And to what end? You’re just delaying the inevitable since you can’t use it for civil rights nor can you allow civil rights to die by filibuster.
This is the start of my second thread of the front pages of newspapers on this date January 21, 2021. Click below for the first thread. #inaguration2021
Front page of the Independent Record on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
Front page of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
Front page of the Daily News on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
Front page of the Tallahassee Democrat on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
Front page of the Wyoming Tribune Eagle on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021 pic.twitter.com/9fmnaJtChM
— Dr. Jeffrey Guterman (@JeffreyGuterman) January 21, 2021
Front page of the Independent Record on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
Front page of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
Front page of the Daily News on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
Front page of the Tallahassee Democrat on this date January 21, 2021. #OTD #Inauguration2021
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
