“For I will consider my Cat Jeoffry.
For he is the servant of the Living God duly and daily serving him.
For at the first glance of the glory of God in the East he worships in his way.”

From Jubliate Agno by Anglican poet Christopher Smart. A friend of Samuel Johnson, he wrote the poem whilst confined in a lunatic asylum due to heavy debts and alleged “religious mania” https://t.co/shyikoPIod
What is it about cats, iconoclastic art and the madhouse? Painter and Bethlem patient Louis Wain was also cat crazy, producing unusual but commercially successful art almost entirely about cats.
Wain may or may not have been schizophrenic or just highly autistic, but he appears to have had a breakdown following his wife's slow death by cancer. In that time he and her drew much comfort from their cat Peter, which seems to have sparked his obsessive love of cats.
Dogs are a more obvious source of comfort and company for many, but they are essentially extroverts that you take for walks, go hunting with or just bring to the pub. Cats appeal to something else, special to invalids, prisoners and those in mourning and distress.
Dogs are part of the same pack as their own, cats have an interior life not fully accessible to their “owners”. This very distance oddly makes a cat a better companion in confinement and distress –– a cat represents mystery and escape, a fragment of the wild world.
Cats bring comfort in the way that nature brings comfort. They draw us into an invisible but loving world, an order we cannot fully know or govern, but that compassionately opens a place for us.
A dog is an excellent companion, almost an honorary human. But a cat, no matter how long a pet, always brings something of the thrill of meeting or approaching a wild animal in the countryside. It's the same contemplative joy as the wind in the trees, or gazing at a clear stream.
The magnificent pleasure of owning a dog is that it has been tamed and has entered into human culture and belonging. The great wonder and reassurance of a cat is that it can never be fully tamed, even as it grows fat sleeping besides your fire.
I can well understand why Smart locked up and alone in an 18th century madhouse, or Wain and his wife, overshadowed by a deadly illness, found such comfort in a cat.
Wain is an interesting case because he is so easily dismissed as a sentimental Edwardian caricaturist, but there's something deeper at work. In common with Smart, Wain takes pleasure in the inherent playfulness of cats.
Cats are hunters, shaped by evolution to leap and chase after small fast moving objects. They'll pounce on mice and birds, but seem equally happy when presented with a sunbeam or their own tail.
Cats reveal something about the natural world, and our own own animal natures too. Their very otherness and interior lives makes them more perfect mirrors. For all its dark logic and struggle, nature is equally comprehensible as narrative, dance and play.
The funny thing about biology is that no animal is motivated by evolutionary urges. No living thing mates, eats, hunts or races across the ground because it wants to propagate its genes (sorry Dawkins). They (and we) do so because it brings pleasure, or escapes pain.
The childish urge to play, to do a thing for the joy of it, to run to see how fast you can go, to shout to see how loud your voice can echo, to seize food with both hands and race away when called to bed, is at one with the animal spirit of life –– Bergson's elan vital.
More than just a brute search for pleasure, play has an ordering effect, our desires bring us into contact with other desiring and living things, a community of desire that has the quality of play –– nature is a kind of playground.
Pre-urban indigenous groups are most naturally in touch with this perspective, which is why the just-so stories of groups from the Bushmen to the Aborigines to the Native Americans are filled with stories about animals negotiating their relationships.
The impulse to see the human in the animal and vice versa, is a continuous factor however, and is no less visible in the medieval bestiary tradition, which drew moral and prudential lessons from the natural order
Many of those who end up in asylums are poorly adapted to a highly rationalistic and urban society, where trust is low and calculating machiavellian intelligence pays off. Wain and Smart were both in financial trouble, and were exploited by cannier souls.
They became mad partly because they couldn't fit into society, and were placed under growing burdens. Creativity is reliably correlated to mental illness –– they think differently, and feel things more strongly.
In traditional societies such characters (autistic, schizophrenic, depressive) would be more likely to be honoured and given status, in more rationalistic mass societies, they are disruptive and grow more isolated and anti-social, eccentricities become pathologies.
Asylums had their many problems, but the best of them (especially in Wain's time) were just that –– refuges from a world of money and calculation, which allowed troubled souls who could find no place in the world a home and a place of safety and comfort.
The sanctuary that Wain and Smart found, the animal world, was an instinctive return to a world that had a place for them. Rather than the realm of calculation and alienation, they rediscovered the divine and natural world of play, the realm of analogy, symbol and contemplation.
End of this extremely and proudly mad thread about cats, nature, the madhouse and (as ever) the horrors of the modern world. 👋

More from All

You May Also Like

This is NONSENSE. The people who take photos with their books on instagram are known to be voracious readers who graciously take time to review books and recommend them to their followers. Part of their medium is to take elaborate, beautiful photos of books. Die mad, Guardian.


THEY DO READ THEM, YOU JUDGY, RACOON-PICKED TRASH BIN


If you come for Bookstagram, i will fight you.

In appreciation, here are some of my favourite bookstagrams of my books: (photos by lit_nerd37, mybookacademy, bookswrotemystory, and scorpio_books)
शमशान में जब महर्षि दधीचि के मांसपिंड का दाह संस्कार हो रहा था तो उनकी पत्नी अपने पति का वियोग सहन नहीं कर पायी और पास में ही स्थित विशाल पीपल वृक्ष के कोटर में अपने तीन वर्ष के बालक को रख के स्वयं चिता पे बैठ कर सती हो गयी ।इस प्रकार ऋषी दधीचि और उनकी पत्नी की मुक्ति हो गयी।


परन्तु पीपल के कोटर में रखा बालक भूख प्यास से तड़पने लगा। जब कुछ नहीं मिला तो वो कोटर में पड़े पीपल के गोदों (फल) को खाकर बड़ा होने लगा। कालान्तर में पीपल के फलों और पत्तों को खाकर बालक का जीवन किसी प्रकार सुरक्षित रहा।

एक दिन देवर्षि नारद वहां से गुजर रहे थे ।नारद ने पीपल के कोटर में बालक को देख कर उसका परिचय मांगा -
नारद बोले - बालक तुम कौन हो?
बालक - यही तो मैं भी जानना चहता हूँ ।
नारद - तुम्हारे जनक कौन हैं?
बालक - यही तो मैं भी जानना चाहता हूँ ।

तब नारद ने आँखें बन्द कर ध्यान लगाया ।


तत्पश्चात आश्चर्यचकित हो कर बालक को बताया कि 'हे बालक! तुम महान दानी महर्षि दधीचि के पुत्र हो । तुम्हारे पिता की अस्थियों का वज्रास्त्र बनाकर ही देवताओं ने असुरों पर विजय पायी थी।तुम्हारे पिता की मृत्यु मात्र 31 वर्ष की वय में ही हो गयी थी'।

बालक - मेरे पिता की अकाल मृत्यु का क्या कारण था?
नारद - तुम्हारे पिता पर शनिदेव की महादशा थी।
बालक - मेरे उपर आयी विपत्ति का कारण क्या था?
नारद - शनिदेव की महादशा।
इतना बताकर देवर्षि नारद ने पीपल के पत्तों और गोदों को खाकर बड़े हुए उस बालक का नाम पिप्पलाद रखा और उसे दीक्षित किया।