a. Bounded by two trend lines; the lower is horizontal and the upper slopes downward.
b. Prices can break in either direction but most commonly downward.
In this Thread, We will cover all important Patterns.
Retweet 🇮🇳 Like ♥️ Follow 📊
Tags:
@kuttrapali26 @caniravkaria
@Jagadeesh0203 @KommawarSwapnil
Open this Thread 🧵
a. Bounded by two trend lines; the lower is horizontal and the upper slopes downward.
b. Prices can break in either direction but most commonly downward.
a. Bounded by a horizontal upper trend line and an upward sloping lower trend line. Each bound is a straight trend line.
b. Prices can break in either direction, but more commonly upward.
a. Three peaks with center peak higher than the other two.
b. Shoulders should be at approximately the same level and the head higher.
c. Target is the distance from the head to the neckline projected from the neckline.
a. Trading range with support and resistance levels bounding price action.
b. Slight tilt, similar to horizontal channel.
a. Trading range with support and resistance levels bounding price action.
b. Slight tilt, similar to horizontal channel.
a. Bounded by two trend lines, each headed in the same direction. Price must touch a trend line at least five times before a breakout.
a. The falling wedge has a series of lower highs and lower lows, but the lower lows are less pronounced than the lower highs, creating more of a wedge than a triangle shape.
a. The wedge represents a pause to consolidate, with rising highs and lows in a narrowing pattern being the first sign that a bearish wedge is forming.
a. The wedge represents a pause to consolidate, with falling highs and lows in a narrowing pattern being the first sign that a bullish wedge is forming.
a. Two successive peaks separated by an opposite reversal point.
b. Either rounded or pointed peaks that are usually at roughly the same price.
c. Price must break out of middle reversal point.
a. Two successive troughs separated by a peak.
b. Either rounded or pointed troughs that are usually at roughly the same price.
c. Price must break out of middle peak.
a. Bounded by a downward sloping upper trend line and an upward sloping lower trend line. Each bound is a straight trend line.
b. Prices must touch each bound atleast twice.
More from All
How can we use language supervision to learn better visual representations for robotics?
Introducing Voltron: Language-Driven Representation Learning for Robotics!
Paper: https://t.co/gIsRPtSjKz
Models: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z
🧵👇(1 / 12)
Videos of humans performing everyday tasks (Something-Something-v2, Ego4D) offer a rich and diverse resource for learning representations for robotic manipulation.
Yet, an underused part of these datasets are the rich, natural language annotations accompanying each video. (2/12)
The Voltron framework offers a simple way to use language supervision to shape representation learning, building off of prior work in representations for robotics like MVP (https://t.co/Pb0mk9hb4i) and R3M (https://t.co/o2Fkc3fP0e).
The secret is *balance* (3/12)
Starting with a masked autoencoder over frames from these video clips, make a choice:
1) Condition on language and improve our ability to reconstruct the scene.
2) Generate language given the visual representation and improve our ability to describe what's happening. (4/12)
By trading off *conditioning* and *generation* we show that we can learn 1) better representations than prior methods, and 2) explicitly shape the balance of low and high-level features captured.
Why is the ability to shape this balance important? (5/12)
Introducing Voltron: Language-Driven Representation Learning for Robotics!
Paper: https://t.co/gIsRPtSjKz
Models: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z
🧵👇(1 / 12)
Videos of humans performing everyday tasks (Something-Something-v2, Ego4D) offer a rich and diverse resource for learning representations for robotic manipulation.
Yet, an underused part of these datasets are the rich, natural language annotations accompanying each video. (2/12)
The Voltron framework offers a simple way to use language supervision to shape representation learning, building off of prior work in representations for robotics like MVP (https://t.co/Pb0mk9hb4i) and R3M (https://t.co/o2Fkc3fP0e).
The secret is *balance* (3/12)
Starting with a masked autoencoder over frames from these video clips, make a choice:
1) Condition on language and improve our ability to reconstruct the scene.
2) Generate language given the visual representation and improve our ability to describe what's happening. (4/12)
By trading off *conditioning* and *generation* we show that we can learn 1) better representations than prior methods, and 2) explicitly shape the balance of low and high-level features captured.
Why is the ability to shape this balance important? (5/12)
