While some veterans have fallen in my esteem based on their responses to the untimely demise of #BipinRawat the #ChiefofDefenceStaff I share some thoughts from a strategic viewpoint on his tenure. Recall that at one point #SandeepDixit the MP from Cong called him a street side

goonda when he was army chief. He attracted unhealthy attention during his tenure as #ChiefofDefenceStaff esp from veterans & even resistance from fellow colleagues as reported. His competence itself was questioned & I have had logical arguments on this with folks here. Looking
back I realised that he was a man in a unique point in Indian military & political history & barring for a politician or a doormat nobody could have become popular. His was a thankless responsibility & from a strategic viewpoint he had just 2 options. Either to win the popularity
contest or be a maverick & unpopular. He chose the latter & correctly so. Only a true leader can make this decision. Let's look at why his tenure was unique. 1) A non Cong govt was in power for the 1st time in Indian history with a foreign policy that was similar but yet very
different from the past. There was a new found self confidence, assertiveness, breaking convention kind of approach across all nations & that needed any army chief to recalibrate the defence strategy 2) There was a clear open aggression & risk taking response to misadventures of
#Pakistan which meant a potential risk of both war & even a nuclear flashpoint. This needed huge huge recalibration from a defense view point 3) A decades long plan to create the position of #ChiefofDefenceStaff was implemented which meant that the power, position, privileges of
the 3 service chiefs would get affected, apart from the civilian admin & it was upto him to navigate these unknown waters 4) The more than once open #Chinese aggression at the border meant a real & present danger of a 2 pronged war again needing recalibration of attitudes 5) The
plan to create theatre commands & move the country into a more modern integrated security environ meant that too many toes would need to be stepped on. There was no time to do this slowly. Any org taking up such a change needs to ram it through first & then reposition with time
6) The make in India plans found new aggression & intent & unlike the previous India when SMEs were involved in bits & pieces the focus changed to big ticket which again meant humongous recalibration of attitudes from the armed forces 7) Threats of cyberwar, drones, electronics
meant that a war technically could become like a video game causing grievous harm to a nation economically & needed geeks & youngsters to be co-opted into solution development again needing a change in attitudes & approach 8) The continued belligerence of China, potshots by admin
opposition & activists to prevent border area development an area neglected for 70 yrs again meant navigating unknown waters 9) With limited funds the forces had to jointly plan acquisitions rather than each chasing their own dreams of grandeur in infra, pensions or land banks
had to be judicially leveraged/managed so as to benefit the forces without hurting - an impossible task in life - & every decision taken would be logically wrong in someone's eyes 10) With #COVID19 the risk of large number of men in uniform being infected, their vaccination only
compounded the challenges he would have been involved in as #ChiefofDefenceStaff . These are just what a layman can see & understand. Am sure internally he would have a few dozen more challenges that we are not privy to. While veterans & other experts can rightfully claim that
they have faced challenges too in their careers, the fact is that were maintaining status quo or bringing in incremental change situation by situation. Nobody in Indian history has had to navigate so many changes that cut across foreign policy, military strategy & preparedness,
a war without an actual war, a pandemic, tri forces integration & change as enumerated above. So his being a bull in a crowded shop wasn't a non option. History will judge him far better & his navigation & leadership during these times needs to be better understood & appreciated.
Talk is easy post retirement or from the comfort of arm chairs. Even the taking over of a small biz unit creates immense stress & problems becoz humans resist change. Anybody trying to bring change in human attitudes will lose the popularity contest unless they were a politician
Every decision would be criticised & can even be mistakes needing course correction not vilification.
So pl readers, do judge #Bipin_Rawat #GeneralBipinRawat #ChiefofDefenceStaff keeping all this in mind & so I say #TussiGreatHo #RIPGenRawat @adgpi @narendramodi @rajnathsingh

More from All

#ஆதித்தியஹ்ருதயம் ஸ்தோத்திரம்
இது சூரிய குலத்தில் உதித்த இராமபிரானுக்கு தமிழ் முனிவர் அகத்தியர் உபதேசித்ததாக வால்மீகி இராமாயணத்தில் வருகிறது. ஆதித்ய ஹ்ருதயத்தைத் தினமும் ஓதினால் பெரும் பயன் பெறலாம் என மகான்களும் ஞானிகளும் காலம் காலமாகக் கூறி வருகின்றனர். ராம-ராவண யுத்தத்தை


தேவர்களுடன் சேர்ந்து பார்க்க வந்திருந்த அகத்தியர், அப்போது போரினால் களைத்து, கவலையுடன் காணப்பட்ட ராமபிரானை அணுகி, மனிதர்களிலேயே சிறந்தவனான ராமா போரில் எந்த மந்திரத்தைப் பாராயணம் செய்தால் எல்லா பகைவர்களையும் வெல்ல முடியுமோ அந்த ரகசிய மந்திரத்தை, வேதத்தில் சொல்லப்பட்டுள்ளதை உனக்கு

நான் உபதேசிக்கிறேன், கேள் என்று கூறி உபதேசித்தார். முதல் இரு சுலோகங்கள் சூழ்நிலையை விவரிக்கின்றன. மூன்றாவது சுலோகம் அகத்தியர் இராமபிரானை விளித்துக் கூறுவதாக அமைந்திருக்கிறது. நான்காவது சுலோகம் முதல் முப்பதாம் சுலோகம் வரை ஆதித்ய ஹ்ருதயம் என்னும் நூல். முப்பத்தி ஒன்றாம் சுலோகம்

இந்தத் துதியால் மகிழ்ந்த சூரியன் இராமனை வாழ்த்துவதைக் கூறுவதாக அமைந்திருக்கிறது.
ஐந்தாவது ஸ்லோகம்:
ஸர்வ மங்கள் மாங்கல்யம் ஸர்வ பாப ப்ரநாசனம்
சிந்தா சோக ப்ரசமனம் ஆயுர் வர்த்தனம் உத்தமம்
பொருள்: இந்த அதித்ய ஹ்ருதயம் என்ற துதி மங்களங்களில் சிறந்தது, பாவங்களையும் கவலைகளையும்


குழப்பங்களையும் நீக்குவது, வாழ்நாளை நீட்டிப்பது, மிகவும் சிறந்தது. இதயத்தில் வசிக்கும் பகவானுடைய அனுக்ரகத்தை அளிப்பதாகும்.
முழு ஸ்லோக லிங்க் பொருளுடன் இங்கே உள்ளது
https://t.co/Q3qm1TfPmk
சூரியன் உலக இயக்கத்திற்கு மிக முக்கியமானவர். சூரிய சக்தியால்தான் ஜீவராசிகள், பயிர்கள்
1. Mini Thread on Conflicts of Interest involving the authors of the Nature Toilet Paper:
https://t.co/VUYbsKGncx
Kristian G. Andersen
Andrew Rambaut
Ian Lipkin
Edward C. Holmes
Robert F. Garry

2. Thanks to @newboxer007 for forwarding the link to the research by an Australian in Taiwan (not on

3. K.Andersen didn't mention "competing interests"
Only Garry listed Zalgen Labs, which we will look at later.
In acknowledgements, Michael Farzan, Wellcome Trust, NIH, ERC & ARC are mentioned.
Author affiliations listed as usual.
Note the 328 Citations!
https://t.co/nmOeohM89Q


4. Kristian Andersen (1)
Andersen worked with USAMRIID & Fort Detrick scientists on research, with Robert Garry, Jens Kuhn & Sina Bavari among


5. Kristian Andersen (2)
Works at Scripps Research Institute, which WAS in serious financial trouble, haemorrhaging 20 million $ a year.
But just when the first virus cases were emerging, they received great news.
They issued a press release dated November 27, 2019:

You May Also Like