Allo allo allo what have we here?

1/

Going to the Source to Prevent Viral Disease Outbreaks

[email protected]
1/4/2018

@jhas5 @rubic3n @BillyBostickson

2/

"When you consider the VIDs that emerged and reemerged around the world in 2017, what many of them have in common is that they originated in animals and spilled over into humans after a series of mutations that enable the pathogens to jump species."

https://t.co/pnu2HUi9ak
3/

PREEMPT aims to advance understanding of viruses and their interaction with animals, insects, and humans, and deliver new, proactive interventions to reduce the risk from emerging and reemerging pathogens.
4/

“DARPA wants to reorient preparedness efforts to make them more proactive, so that instead of only modeling the trajectory of an epidemic as it spreads from H2H, we contain and suppress diseases in the animal species in which they originate before they can jump into people.”
5/

PREEMPT will have 2 technical thrusts: development of multiscale models and test beds to quantify the imminent emergence and reemergence of human pathogens; and development of new, scalable approaches to preventing pathogen spillover and transmission from animals and vectors
6/

That evolutionary process contains natural bottlenecks that could be exploited to impede dangerous mutations. Researchers on the program will... generate data in lab testing and sequence viruses as they evolve... and validate models using simulated natural environments.
7/

New proactive interventions will center on methods for disarming a virus before it can make a jump across species. PREEMPT aims to prevent transmission of virus from a reservoir species direct to humans
8/

... from a reservoir species to traditional vectors, such as mosquitos, that spread disease, and from a reservoir species to a species intermediate to humans—for example, from bats to pigs.
9/

"The Human Immunity Project - and YOU!" @uacjess
10/

For instance, if a single mutation is identified by models as high risk, an intervention might seek to prevent its entry into a new species by removing that specific mutation from the reservoir.
11/

Alternatively, if multiple potential threats are identified, an intervention could involve treating the entire animal reservoir to reduce viral load using tools such as anti-virals, vaccines, and interfering particles
12/

*When a SARSBAT pisses in your mouth but PREEMPT already vaccinated every single small mammal in the entire world
13/

The Boys about to Win the War on Nature
14/

By the end of the program, DARPA seeks to demonstrate in controlled laboratory conditions the suppression of viral jump to a new species.
15/

“If we are able to predict how viruses might mutate and spread, and take steps to prevent those mutations from impacting humans, then we’ll vastly diminish the possibility of future viral pandemics,” said Gimlett.
16/

https://t.co/H1pfRs9dvu
17/

Although PREEMPT is a fundamental research program, DARPA is aware of biosafety and biosecurity sensitivities that could arise.

The agency will work with external bioethics advisors to ensure efforts funded by the program adhere to regulations and ethical best practices.
18/

More from All

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.