How To Come Up With UNIQUE MECHANISMS That Sell

(A Thread)

(1/9)

When you're writing copy, you NEED a unique mechanism.

The unique mechanism is split into 2 parts:

- The unique mechanism behind your PROBLEM
- The unique mechanism behind your SOLUTION

(2/9)
Basic Idea Behind Unique Mechanisms:

Imagine that your prospects has 99% of the answer...

And you're selling them the missing 1%.

You're explaining the "Real Cause" of their problem and offering a solution.

Think MICRO. Not macro.

(3/9)
Let's say we're selling a weight-loss supplement.

During your research you find out that one of the ingredients in your supplement helps activate a protein called 'AMPK'.

(AMPK is a protein that plays a role in metabolism)

(4/9)
Therefore:

CORE problem: Can't lose weight.
UM behind problem: Not enough AMPK in their body

Here's how that would look:

"The reason you can't lose weight ISN'T because of your diet or exercise regimen...

It's actually because your 'Metabolic Switch' isn't active."

(5/9)
"Metabolic Switch" is just a fancy way of talking about AMPK levels.

We're selling them that 1% of missing information that they didn't have access to before.

We're saying:

"look, you just need this ONE tiny piece of the puzzle to finally start losing weight."

(6/9)
Unique Mech Behind The SOLUTION

This part is self explanatory.

The UM behind the problem is the metabolic switch (AMPK).

Therefore, the UM behind the SOLUTION is your supp, which has an ingredient that supports AMPK - turns on your 'metabolic switch'.

(for example).

(7/9)
It takes basic research to come up with unique mechanisms.

Remember:

Imagine that your prospects has had 99% of the answer...

And you're selling them the missing 1%.

(8/9)
This system ISN'T limited to supplement copy either.

You can use this framework for ANY kind of copywriting.

I literally just used this framework to write a sales letter for @blackhatwizardd the other day.

(9/9)

More from All

You May Also Like

कुंडली में 12 भाव होते हैं। कैसे ज्योतिष द्वारा रोग के आंकलन करते समय कुंडली के विभिन्न भावों से गणना करते हैं आज इस पर चर्चा करेंगे।
कुण्डली को कालपुरुष की संज्ञा देकर इसमें शरीर के अंगों को स्थापित कर उनसे रोग, रोगेश, रोग को बढ़ाने घटाने वाले ग्रह


रोग की स्थिति में उत्प्रेरक का कार्य करने वाले ग्रह, आयुर्वेदिक/ऐलोपैथी/होमियोपैथी में से कौन कारगर होगा इसका आँकलन, रक्त विकार, रक्त और आपरेशन की स्थिति, कौन सा आंतरिक या बाहरी अंग प्रभावित होगा इत्यादि गणना करने में कुंडली का प्रयोग किया जाता है।


मेडिकल ज्योतिष में आज के समय में Dr. K. S. Charak का नाम निर्विवाद रूप से प्रथम स्थान रखता है। उनकी लिखी कई पुस्तकें आज इस क्षेत्र में नए ज्योतिषों का मार्गदर्शन कर रही हैं।
प्रथम भाव -
इस भाव से हम व्यक्ति की रोगप्रतिरोधक क्षमता, सिर, मष्तिस्क का विचार करते हैं।


द्वितीय भाव-
दाहिना नेत्र, मुख, वाणी, नाक, गर्दन व गले के ऊपरी भाग का विचार होता है।
तृतीय भाव-
अस्थि, गला,कान, हाथ, कंधे व छाती के आंतरिक अंगों का शुरुआती भाग इत्यादि।

चतुर्थ भाव- छाती व इसके आंतरिक अंग, जातक की मानसिक स्थिति/प्रकृति, स्तन आदि की गणना की जाती है


पंचम भाव-
जातक की बुद्धि व उसकी तीव्रता,पीठ, पसलियां,पेट, हृदय की स्थिति आंकलन में प्रयोग होता है।

षष्ठ भाव-
रोग भाव कहा जाता है। कुंडली मे इसके तत्कालिक भाव स्वामी, कालपुरुष कुंडली के स्वामी, दृष्टि संबंध, रोगेश की स्थिति, रोगेश के नक्षत्र औऱ रोगेश व भाव की डिग्री इत्यादि।
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".