Mollyycolllinss Categories Society
In which I argue that we are arguing about some of the wrong things. We Need to Change the Terms of the Debate on Trans Kids https://t.co/qqDdKnAGMB via @NewYorker
— masha gessen (@mashagessen) January 13, 2021
When we think about criminalizing care for trans youth - which is what states are currently trying to do - the efforts are intimately connected to codifying notions of irreversibility and constraining bodily self-determination.
This is why we see bills both criminalize care for trans youth while permitting surgical intervention on intersex infants to "normalize" their bodies in alignment with binary constructions of sexed difference.
Many of the newly introduced state bills also mandate disclosure by school staff to parents and guardians of any trans or questioning young person thus chilling the ability of young people to safely explore their identities and bodies.
Despair is tied not only to forcibly having treatment cutoff and the state criminalizing transition but also in losing self-determination. Many young people who are accessing medical care do not (and will not) have binary identities.
To start with, I'm not talking about the “armed protesters.” There is overlap but not all goobers with giant guns are like this. The most violent white supremacist terrorists, though, are a lot like AQ or ISIS. Again, some actively nurture that connection.
The Base are also big AQ fans. If that confuses you, it shouldn't. At its core, this is not about ideology. Terror is terror. https://t.co/OWY4cBF9JV pic.twitter.com/R6iyoHYdkm
— Sulome (@SulomeAnderson) January 9, 2021
We know they have been actively training and recruiting current/former military and law enforcement for years. Many attempted serious terror attacks that thankfully were prevented, like this one by a Coast Guard officer who made a kill list of Democrats.
What really makes these groups similar to ISIS is that they also want to trigger the end of the world as we know it. People like that are very dangerous, and they are currently emboldened because they believe the U.S. government is on their side--for now.
They are also shitting themselves at the thought of a progressive presidential administration committed to addressing racial/gender inequality and gun control, among other markers of an evolved civilization. These are people who want to take us backward, to a darker time.
What does good leadership look like when everyone works from home?\u2013Top scientists @raffasadun and Ernst Fehr will provide you with some answers on 27 January \u2013 online and for free in our Academy of Behavioral Economics https://t.co/Di6hRqPvAA
— G. Duttweiler Inst' (@GDInstitute) January 15, 2021
Ernst Fehr is talking about evidence and challenges of work at home arrangements.
Key question: Do we have the technological capacities to work at home? And is it a trend or a sustainable transformation?
Ernst Fehr @econ_uzh #EconomicsForSociety
Will this prevail in the long-run?
Ernst Fehr @econ_uzh #EconomicsForSociety
The problem of sustaining cooperation in the long-run: How do we prevent the deterioration of collaboration?
Ernst Fehr @econ_uzh #EconomicsForSociety
\U0001f3f4\U000e0067\U000e0062\U000e0073\U000e0063\U000e0074\U000e007f\U0001f680 Today\u2019s the day! Our report is now live. Check out the Citizens\u2019 Assembly of Scotland\u2019s shared vision for the future of Scotland and 60 recommendations \U0001f4cc https://t.co/SfGb3xmTIJ https://t.co/62K3zPeTqI
— Citizens' Assembly of Scotland (@CitAssemblyScot) January 13, 2021
We spoke about the Citizens' Assembly and one of their most exciting plans on the Policy Podcast in
Go and read their reports at
Here are some of the policies they've called for that line up well with @Common_Weal polices (with links to our papers):
[Recommendation 3] A House of Citizens to oversee the Scottish Parliament -
[12] All tax-payer funded documentation to be automatically made publicly available and easily searchable -
"We do want and will have an inclusive field of philosophy. That we will have, and, if it involves the destruction of your departments and institutions, we cannot help it."
— Dr. Johnathan Flowers says "Fuck your Democracy." (@shengokai) January 13, 2021
The above is from Gen. Sherman on what is necessary to restore the Union during the Civil War, the sentiment is apt for my position on philosophy: if we are to have an inclusive field and the structure of the field prevents that, then that structure must be destroyed. (2/n)
Now, I understand that this sounds harsh, but consider why it sounds harsh: so much of the pushback against transphobia in philosophy, and the recommendations made to address transphobia in philosophy sounds like "damage" to philosophy by established philosophers. (3/n)
And in response to that perception of damage or destruction, they push back hard to preserve the "integrity" of the field, regardless of the harm being done to the marginalized people who have to survive an inhospitable field that refuses to change. (4/n)
Now, this position was anticipated by Sara Ahmed in the following:
“Indeed so often just talking about sexism as well as racism is heard as damaging the institution. If talking about sexism and racism is heard as damaging institutions, we need to damage institutions.” (5/n)