Broad, philosophical thread about how a hybrid authoritarian regime like Russia uses repression when citizens protest.

On this day of protests for #Navalny across Russia.

#RussiaProtests (1/21)

First of all, the defining ethical feature of the modern world is that each human life has equal moral worth.

Only the most extreme regimes can disregard - without consequences - that their citizens are cognisant of this.

#RussiaProtests

(2/21)
In Belarus, escalating violence against protestors caused the regime more damage than it had hoped.

Unlike Belarus, where the special police numbers a couple of thousand, the Russian special police can handle vast numbers of protestors.

#RussiaProtests

(3/21)
So could the Putin regime order the special police, the broader national guard, and regular police to round up 10,000 protestors, and adopt Gestapo-like tactics on them?

At this stage, no- the regime would consider that an act of existential self harm.

#RussiaProtests

(4/21)
The regime can take extreme steps with individuals, e.g. Navalny. But it's not ready to universalise this to all citizens.

Moreover, it can't. The bodies of state responsible for organised violence in Russia compete with one another, & aren't part of a vertical system.

(5/21)
Could Navalny himself benefit form this conflict? Absolutely!

@GlebPavlovsky, an ex Putin strategist, said this week that there is conflict at the heart of the regime between civilians and military/security folks about how to handle Navalny.

#RussiaProtests

(6/21)
Pavlovsky says this is elevated Putin himself, who can now assert himself by arbitrating between the two teams. So far Putin has gone with the military/security folks.

But the civilian folks are pointing out that so far the military/security folks are messing up.

(7/21)
Back to the protests. There is a paradoxical sense in which citizens are less open to state violence in an authoritarian state than they are in a democracy.

Even the 'defund the police' case in the US still grants the police considerable legitimacy. 

#RussiaProtests

(8/21)
In an authoritarian regime, it is easier to argue that ANYTHING the police does is merely illegitimate violence.

When these regimes engage in violence against citizens, they magnify a latent perception of their illegitimacy.

#RussiaProtests

(9/21)
Putin has called the collapse of the USSR 'the greatest geo political catastrophe of the 20th century'. He is acutely aware that killing protestors - whether in the Soviet Union, or in the Ukraine, or Belarus - can undermine a regime.

#RussiaProtests

(10/21)
In 2019 Moscow saw the largest public protests since the early 1990s. This was after the national guard engaged in violence against a smaller group of protestors (protesting a fixed election to the Moscow Duma).

#RussiaProtests

(11/21)
But there is a 'but' to everything said above. The regime is keen to threaten that it will do the things I have argued it can't/won't do to dissuade protestors from coming out.

The preference is usually to issue these threats indirectly.

#RussiaProtests

(12/21)
The regime may send messages to schools, feed rumours into online forums, contrive leaks from security organs.

Very often this will be local and directed to areas where protest gives them the greatest concern.

#RussiaProtests

(13/21)
Ahead of today's #navalnyprotests , the authorities have been concerned about protest messages on TikTok generating hundreds of millions of views.

#RussiaProtests

(14/21)
Everything we have said above is magnified if the protestors are under 18.

The regime has been esp keen to scare not just school children but parents and relatives about all kinds of fictional but nightmarish, including the use of fire arms.

#RussiaProtests

(15/21)
If you were a Russian citizen (as I am not) and wanted to partake in a protest against Putin, what would be the risk?

Unless you are a public figure (in which case your risks will be higher), your risks will be minor.

#RussiaProtests

(16/21)
Protestors who don't carry a placard, aren't the last to leave, and protest peacefully, will get home safely the night of the protest in the majority of cases.

#RussiaProtests

(17/21)
What happens to those who are arrested? Typically they will sit in a police van, which may remain parked for hours until it is fully loaded with arrested protestors.

#RussiaProtests

(18/21)
At the station, after much bureaucracy, they will be ordered to appear in court and sent home charged with unsanctioned protest.

A minority may be kept in the cell over night or longer.

#RussiaProtests

(19/21)
And a smaller minority will face more serious charges reserved for violent rioting. Unfortunately, these charges will likely be applied arbitrarily, and they can be ruinous for a career or education.

#RussiaProtests

(20/21)
So that's a bit about protest in a regime such as Russia.

Find my full breakdown video below (up on YouTube this morning).

Ask me any question you like about this thread. Thanks for reading!

(21/21) #RussiaProtests

📽️ https://t.co/jS25OyG9oH

More from World

Good question: what proofs has BDA provided of his authenticity?

Let's go through some of them.


- BDA predicted the Saudis would assassinate Suleimani. They did.
- He said the dog that got Badghadi's arm deserved a Medal Of Honor. The next day the President posted a joke image showing him giving the dog a MoH.

- He said one of his ops in Syria would severely disrupt a CIA drug trafficking operation. This was proved true within a few days:
https://t.co/Hranupwcxj
- He sent gold to Brazil to help pay for an anti-trafficking operation there. That op became public soon afterwards.

- On May 31 this year, he predicted the President would be giving a speech the next day. June 1, the President gives a surprise address at the Rose Garden.
- He predicted the US would be making diplomatic moves on Greenland. True.

- He said the US would be pulling all troops out of Afghanistan. This was confirmed within the month.
- He claimed earthquakes would be hitting Iran's nuclear facilities in December. Yep.
- There were FOUR facilities hit, not the three made public. Also true.
Watch the entire discussion if you have the time to do so. But if not, please make sure to watch Edhem Eldem summarizing ~150 years of democracy in Turkey in 6 minutes (starting on 57'). And if you can't watch it, fear not; I've transcribed it for you (as public service). Thread:


"Let me start by saying that I am a historian, I see dead people. But more seriously, I am constantly torn between the temptation to see patterns developing over time, and the fear of hasty generalizations and anachronistic comparisons. 1/n

"Nevertheless, the present situation forces me to explore the possible historical dimensions of the problem we're facing today. 2/n

"(...)I intend to go further back in time and widen the angle in order to focus on the confusion I  believe exists between the notions of 'state', 'government', and 'public institutions' in Turkey. 3/n

"In the summer of 1876, that's a historical quote, as Midhat Pasa was trying to draft a constitution, Edhem Pasa wrote to Saffet Pasa, and I quote in Turkish, 'Bize Konstitusyon degil enstitusyon lazim' ('It is not a constitution we need but institutions'). 4/n

You May Also Like