Bad things tourists have done in Bali that I witnessed because I lived in Bali for three years and will be back soon~ A Thread.

1. There’s this tourist couple. The guy kissed the girl’s ass at a sacred place then took a picture and basically say they think the idea of the place being ‘sacred’ is stupid. They apologized but I don’t think they meant it, I think they said sorry because they got caught
2. A ‘feminist’ tourist made a controversy by saying that it is very sexist because women who are having their period can’t go inside the sacred places. She said it was such a sexist and stupid thing to do when we have. We have our beliefs, some tourists don’t want to respect it.
3. My own group of friends who are foreigners are talking in the front of me with their own language and one of them who’s not asshole translated ‘they are saying that they have to say it in our language for you to not understand. But they are saying Indonesian people are slow’
4. Some tourists even told clubs that they feel unsecured if there are local people. WE ARE IN BALI, HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?
5. This might not be a big deal. BUT TOURISTS ALSO STEAL HELMET AT CLUBS PARKING LOT. Yes, motorbike helmets, we mostly ride motorbike.
Don’t even try to ask me about racism. So many tourists are racist to Indonesian people WHEN THEY ARE LITERALLY IN BALI.
6. Tourists are looking down at us for having cheap prices but they also brag how expensive things are in their country. I’m sorry you can’t afford it in your own land lmao...

More from World

Watch the entire discussion if you have the time to do so. But if not, please make sure to watch Edhem Eldem summarizing ~150 years of democracy in Turkey in 6 minutes (starting on 57'). And if you can't watch it, fear not; I've transcribed it for you (as public service). Thread:


"Let me start by saying that I am a historian, I see dead people. But more seriously, I am constantly torn between the temptation to see patterns developing over time, and the fear of hasty generalizations and anachronistic comparisons. 1/n

"Nevertheless, the present situation forces me to explore the possible historical dimensions of the problem we're facing today. 2/n

"(...)I intend to go further back in time and widen the angle in order to focus on the confusion I  believe exists between the notions of 'state', 'government', and 'public institutions' in Turkey. 3/n

"In the summer of 1876, that's a historical quote, as Midhat Pasa was trying to draft a constitution, Edhem Pasa wrote to Saffet Pasa, and I quote in Turkish, 'Bize Konstitusyon degil enstitusyon lazim' ('It is not a constitution we need but institutions'). 4/n

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?