Navalny’s return, his arrest and the protest. A first quick thread
1. Navalny in Germany had rot make a difficult choice: to stay in exile and become insignificant or to return to stay significant (and may be even rise more), but under risk for his freedom and life. /2

2. I can’t imaging that Navalny and his team thought that his return and even his arrest might provoke a „revolutionary situation“ in Russia like we’ve seen in Ukraine earlier or Belarus now. he’s a too experienced politician for such a misjudgment. He’s playing the long game./3
3. He had to wage his wishes and the risk. His preferred the possibility of a rather long imprisonment to the perspective of insignificance in evil. He’s more than 20 y. younger than Putin. The next medium-term goal will be „smart voting“ in the Duma elections next September. /4
4. Nobody can with certainty predict the tipping point of political developments. No revolutionary moment was ever predicted.Lenin did not know that he will succeed, when he returned to Russia in 1917. What he knew was that there is a crises. There is a multiple crisis in…/5
…Russia now, too. No really worrying for Putin. But worrying enough to be afraid of an upcoming challenger to try to not let become him too strong. So far Putin’s strategy was to use only as much force as needed. This is a strategy that demand first certain skills…/6
…(which are increasingly lacking in the Kremlin) and it come at one point to a natural end, because only force is left. /7
5. For any political contender there are two main problems. First: People almost never prefer a contender to a ruling politician, because they find him so much better and more likeable. A contender has always to wait for mistakes. That s/he can do is to raise enough…/8
…pressure to make mistakes more likely. That’s what Navalny, quite skilfully, is doing all the time. Second: No contender knows the right time to call for the final attack in advance. S/he has to guess and to try. This most probably includes many times to fail, to try…/9
…again, to fail better and so on. All this by the threat of exhaustion and disappointment of his followers and, even more important, this, who will follow him only, when they smell her/his victory coming. The dilemma is that this people are the deciding one./10
6. Navalny has one more important disadvantage. In Russia a deep crisis of trust (in politics in general and politicians particularly) is pre failing for many years now. Its not likely to end soon. Putin until recently managed to stay aside of it. But now it seems, he’s…/11
…been drawn into it, too. But a Soviet heritage still supports his case: the „double thinking“. Most people in Russia don’t trust the state institutions and those who are in charge. But they believe that only the state is the only hope that’s left./12
The state today is Putin and he will remain the state until its over. /13
7. What has Navalny achieved so far?
First: He’s build the first and only nationwide network of supporters except of those the Kremlin controls.
Second: This network is working without his direct involvement.
Third: The poisoning and the return have both boosted his …/14
…name recognition, partly even his popularity. He’s now undoubtely the number two politician in the country.
Forth: He seems to mobilise even people, who are not content with his political agenda or opinion, but with his approach of being Putin’s contender./15
If he and his supporters will be able to translate this into something that can be, with some plausibility, declared a victory of his „smart voting“ campaign in the Duma election in September, he would be even stronger. If he still will be alive. /end

More from World

I'll bite, Mr. Gray. We can even play by your rather finicky rules.

Let's begin with some of the things you have said about Xinjiang, notably absent from your more recent media appearances, but still present in your blog about your 2014 biking trip.


The following is taken from an ongoing list I keep of people who have been to Xinjiang and written/spoken about their experiences. It is separate from the testimony of detainees and their relatives I also keep. Jerry is on this

Jerry, your article for CGTN, as well as your various Medium pieces, belabor themselves to emphasize the smoothness of your time in Xinjiang. Why did you leave out so many details from your log of your 2014 trip? They seem relevant.

For example, would CGTN not let you speak about Shanshan, the town that evidently disturbed you so much?


Why, pray tell, after noting how kind and hospitable Xinjiang police were to you in 2019 for CGTN—and how you were never told where you could or could not go—would you omit these details?
Niger state shares borders with Zamfara, kebbi, Kaduna & Benin Republic. Terrorists from Niger republic and Burkina faso easily move money and arms across the borders of Kebbi, Zamfara and Benin R into Niger state. According to UN over 900,000 people have been displaced in B'Faso https://t.co/65YEMJhqDp


Niger, Mali and Burkina faso are weak countries populated by Shell terrorists who have now found a safe haven in the forests in Kaduna and Niger state. Birin Gwari, Mokwa forest, Nanati forests, Kanji lake areas.

No decent human resides permanently in forests.

We are facing both external and internal threats from these weak and failed countries we are surrounded with. As a senator you know that a FG police system with less than 300k officers can't actively police the landmass and borders in the North.
Form your state police now!

You and other senators should scrap the FG police system and devote the unaudited security votes and constituency allowance to policing your corridors and forests. Let the airforce bomb them and put your rangers in the forests. Issue an ultimatum for those in the forests to leave

You are all living in a dream if you think the current police structure will become efficient overnight.
Budget, Personnel, Technology, Equipment, Surveillance..It's impossible.
Form your state and community police and flush out the terrorists.

You May Also Like