Thread for Setting up ToS Scanners based on how I do it.
High Volume Scan:
Go to the Scan tab in ToS. It might have fields, just 'x' them out so it looks like mine. Then click the "add filter button"
Then you can check it against my scan here:
https://t.co/mstmJNRMyc
But dont you feel better building something yourself?
More from Watchlist
Im sharing A stock Screener+Swing Strategy
Criteria
Screener to Find Swing Stocks.
1. 15% Range of Near 52 week high
2. Avg Volume > 1 lakh
3. Market Cap > 2000 Cr
4. Roe Roce > 20%
5. Eps Increasing Qtr on Qtr
6. Above 50 ema
1/
How to use This Screener
1. Basically we are screening Fundamentally strong stock
2. These are Technically Strong also as stocks are near 52 week high and above 50 ema
3. Below is the list For the screened Stocks.
4. Target should be on RR
@StocksNerd @MarketScientist
2/
When to Enter
1. When 52 week High is Broken
2. Filter Stocks Select Stock With High Relative Strength
Example : #CosmoFilms , #Mastek
3. Keep Sl Below 21 ema
4. Keep Trailing Using 21 ema
5. Enter stocks on high volume breakout
6.Look for Price Range Contraction
3.
Your Most work is done by the screener
The most important task is filtering out manually and that's where your Returns will differ
As we are screening TechnoFunda stocks these can used for momentum investing
Join telegram https://t.co/b4N4oPAto9
@AmitabhJha3 @chartians
Criteria
Screener to Find Swing Stocks.
1. 15% Range of Near 52 week high
2. Avg Volume > 1 lakh
3. Market Cap > 2000 Cr
4. Roe Roce > 20%
5. Eps Increasing Qtr on Qtr
6. Above 50 ema
1/
How to use This Screener
1. Basically we are screening Fundamentally strong stock
2. These are Technically Strong also as stocks are near 52 week high and above 50 ema
3. Below is the list For the screened Stocks.
4. Target should be on RR
@StocksNerd @MarketScientist
2/
When to Enter
1. When 52 week High is Broken
2. Filter Stocks Select Stock With High Relative Strength
Example : #CosmoFilms , #Mastek
3. Keep Sl Below 21 ema
4. Keep Trailing Using 21 ema
5. Enter stocks on high volume breakout
6.Look for Price Range Contraction
3.
Your Most work is done by the screener
The most important task is filtering out manually and that's where your Returns will differ
As we are screening TechnoFunda stocks these can used for momentum investing
Join telegram https://t.co/b4N4oPAto9
@AmitabhJha3 @chartians
Everyone knows Apple, Amazon, Microsoft...
But how do you find the next $AFRM, $PLTR, or $USPT early?
Here are 9 GREAT resources for finding stock ideas (8 of them are FREE):
1: ETFs
Look through the holdings of high-growth ETFs
Google the ETF symbol and “holdings”
These are worth cracking open:
▪️ $ARKF / $ARKG / $ARKK / $ARKW
▪️ $FFTY
▪️ $HACK
▪️ $IZRL
▪️ $TMFC
2: Fund Managers
Type a fund you respect into @Whalewisdom
You can see all their holding and get emails of any changes
These funds are worth tracking:
▪️AKre Capital
▪️AKO Capital
▪️Dorsey Asset
▪️Fundsmith
▪️Polen Capital
More
3: Newly Public Companies
▪️Direct Listings
▪️IPOs
▪️SPACs
Are a great idea source
Helpful resources:
▪️ https://t.co/jJW01WpJQh
▪️
4. Screeners
@Finviz is great for screening by sector/industry
@Stockcard is great for screening by themes (like the mega-trends listed below)
But how do you find the next $AFRM, $PLTR, or $USPT early?
Here are 9 GREAT resources for finding stock ideas (8 of them are FREE):
1: ETFs
Look through the holdings of high-growth ETFs
Google the ETF symbol and “holdings”
These are worth cracking open:
▪️ $ARKF / $ARKG / $ARKK / $ARKW
▪️ $FFTY
▪️ $HACK
▪️ $IZRL
▪️ $TMFC
2: Fund Managers
Type a fund you respect into @Whalewisdom
You can see all their holding and get emails of any changes
These funds are worth tracking:
▪️AKre Capital
▪️AKO Capital
▪️Dorsey Asset
▪️Fundsmith
▪️Polen Capital
More
Here are some of the big investors that track:
— Brian Feroldi (@BrianFeroldi) February 17, 2021
Altarock Partners
AKO Capital
Appaloosa
Akre Capital
Broad Run
Dorsey Asset
Duquense
Ensemble
Fundsmith
Polen Capital
Third Point
Here are their current top 10 holdings (in order) and links to their latest buys/sells \u2b07\ufe0f
3: Newly Public Companies
▪️Direct Listings
▪️IPOs
▪️SPACs
Are a great idea source
Helpful resources:
▪️ https://t.co/jJW01WpJQh
▪️
4. Screeners
@Finviz is great for screening by sector/industry
@Stockcard is great for screening by themes (like the mega-trends listed below)
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
