BC VALUATION
Saved by @AnmolNarula11

A thread: How to value? 🏦💰❓

Sharing my learnings from my journey so far.

 Initially when I started out I used to ignore what anybody would have to say about their style of valuing a business and I would blindly copy what Benjamin Graham’s book, The Intelligent Investor had to say.

Later came a stage where I realized Benjamin style was not working.
Before we get into the learning, here is the background to it:

If you have been following me for the past 1 year you would have noticed how my valuation method has changed.
I used to struggle a lot with valuation and it would be at the back of my mind the whole day thinking what are these investors doing to value. I tried DCF but that didn’t work for me. (Don’t hate me for that, its my personal choice)
I used to attend Bloomberg Quint’s talk on Zoom, message investors, read books, etc. to figure out: How to value? (The frustration had got to a level that I took break from investing for 3-4 weeks)
I has asked @contrarianEPS on how to value and this is what he replied: https://t.co/qO0TQnaQBs

“Take help of someone to learn it” is the crucial line there.
Soon I met @ishmohit1 via Twitter and that’s where I started to get clarity on valuation.

Again if you have been following me for more than a year, I used to be the “CCL Product guy”. I was so bullish on the company that I had my 70% portfolio in it.
Don’t worry about my allocation skills, I have got better in portfolio allocation overtime - thanks to @ishmohit1, @ashishkila sir, and @ashwinidamani sir.
One of the best days in my investing journey: https://t.co/ujz0O3emZ2

After we connected we discussed various businesses, especially CCL Products because we both were tracking it very carefully. Soon, he offered me to write blogs for @soicfinance and the learning started.
Coming to the learnings, mostly I try to make a bet when it fall in the falling three categories:

1. Good business available at extremely cheap valuation
2. Great-Good business with reasonable valuation
3. Good business but can’t compromise on valuation
First: Good business available at extremely cheap valuation

In this situation the business analysis provides you insights that you understand such a business should not be trading at current valuation.
The business has growth triggers, the industry cycle is getting started, problems which the business is facing are short term, etc.

The example for this situation would be companies like ICICI Securities and Manappuram Finance.
ICICI securities: The business is not the old broking firm it used to be. Management has realized that discount broking is the real threat and their platform sucks. Now, they are focusing on their strength and trying to leverage their brand of ICICI.
But such businesses are deep cyclicals and one can only enter when the valuations are extremely depressed. I entered when the business was trading around 13-14 PE, the industry structure was changing, and the market was booming.
As I said these are cyclical stocks so I reduced my position at intervals when it hit 20 PE but I still hold the business.

Manappuram Finance: This gold lending business is another one which falls under this category...
...The business is currently facing short term competition from banks as they entered Manappuram’s territory and started gaining market share in the high customer segment but I feel management is learning from their mistake and the fundamentals are going to improve.
Totally visible from the latest concall where they finally changed their loan tenure. Someone I admire had mentioned that, “Don’t worry about the stock performance. One day it will get so cheap that it has to rerate.” :)
But one thing I still have to learn is when to get out, because sometimes it can take years for the stock to rerate. Right now the whole market is in a bullish phase hence it is easy to say for me that rerating would happen, but if it doesn’t such stocks become difficult to hold.
Second: Great-Good business with reasonable valuation.

In this situation you would be able to identify that there is a Great-Good business which on the face of it looks expensive but actually available at reasonable valuations.
Here you won’t be able to make the call independently. You need to talk to smart investors out there, in my case my mentors, and understand what they think about the business. Getting a third opinion matters a lot as you don’t want to blind fold yourself.
Once, you get their feedback and you realize that you are not being irrational then one goes ahead with the bet.

In this category falls the music streaming business Saregama.

Disclosure: my buying price is around Rs.2400 with the highest allocation.
Let’s look at the chart when I was buying:

The stock was already 10-11x from its March 2020 lows and trading around 40 PE.

My first reaction was, “Dammit! I missed the bus.” I saw the chart and looked at the 1999-2000 peak and thought “Aur kitna upar jaayega”…
@ishmohit1 is very bullish on this company, so I asked him that the business has already gone 10x why would you buy it now?

He said absolute valuation matters. New facts of the business were emerging as their Caravan sales went to zero, the hidden gem came into the limelight.
That is where I got confidence to reject the chart and focus on the business and it’s been a good journey so far. :)

1. Their music streaming was growing above 20% (rather they have increased the guidance to 25-30% now)
2. industry tailwinds were such that as more people would buy streaming services their profit would increase multiple times
3. no threat from new entrant (except foreign players)
4. Top player was losing out focus on the music business
5. visibility of growth for next 2-3 years
Third: Good business but can’t compromise on valuation.

Over here, one identifies a good business but the entry valuation is very important here. As with these businesses the cycle could change suddenly, their raw material prices could fluctuate, or they do not have moat, etc.
One such industry is Pipes industries. It is a shallow cyclical industry, one has to exit as soon as the cycle ends but due to the nature of the industry one would get time to exit.
You would start getting signals that their end consumer industry has started facing headwinds and now could be the time to exit. But yes, it is not that simple and that is why entry valuation matters which provides you margin of safety for wrong exit.
Apollo Pipes is a good example.

I was a little late to read this business and missed the opportunity. I couldn’t buy a small player at 40 PE, 3.5 Price to Sales, and with lowest return ratios in the hope that management would perform. The risk to reward was not in favor.
But the same was not true with Prince Pipes, they are one of the top 4 players in the industry, with the required capacity and distribution system, and with a good brand name.
The only thing required was better execution of the management with relatively favorable valuations at around 30-35 PE, price to sales less than 3, fast grower, and among the top players.
Inshort

The mistake in the first situation would be opportunity cost. In second, it would be the risk in identifying the wrong business and in third it is overpaying for the business.
There is a lot of wisdom out there on how to value but such abundance is the problem itself. One would say follow DCF another would say relative PE is just fine. But the best way to learn is, find a mentor whose approach you admire and learn under them.
Link to blog post: https://t.co/W7pGIskdWb

More from Valuation

Leading Nowhere
Leading Nowhere
@leading_nowhere
@Dinesh_Sairam @a_basumallick @ashwinidamani Questions that are only answered with time haha.

@a_basumallick @ashwinidamani Just to add - sustainable FCF is a faraway concept for most till (if) they gain scale or innovate/add value. Till then, it's generally always a struggle to manage WC and capacity addition. Wouldn't expect that to change for a while.
VALUATION , ACCOUNTING
Kyle Harrison
Kyle Harrison
@kwharrison13
A private company's valuation is as much a story as anything else

"VC rounds are priced. Not valued" @Post_Market

If VCs are all about pattern-recognition but all the data has suddenly changed, how does anyone know what a company's valuation should
VALUATION
Advertisement
Omar Abdel-Maged
Omar Abdel-Maged
@oabdelmaged1
In @HowardMarksBook's memo early this year, one key thing I realized is how wrong I was to dismiss some businesses because I thought they were overvalued simply after looking at the P/E, P/S ratio etc.

You can't determine a business is overvalued without knowing the in-depth qualitative fundamentals of the business, because otherwise where is your edge? Anyone in the world can simply look at a company's P/E ratio.


I know this seems obvious, but so many people on fintwit are very guilty of this - myself included.

Unless I really know and understand a business, even if it has a seemingly absurd P/E or P/S ratio, I will refrain from concluding it is overvalued. It's just lazy and wrong.

The weird thing about this is that when I'm normally researching a business, I totally understand this about valuation and do in-depth research and determine if it's undervalued. But then I'm quickly dismissive of a tech company that trades at 50x earnings and say it's overvalued
VALUATION
pranav mandora
pranav mandora
@pranavmandora
@soicfinance @suru27 Indeed. For later, industry/sector has to be within your circle of competence to judge the turnaround correctly.

Because according to Warren Buffett
"Both our operating and investment experience cause us to conclude that turnarounds seldom turn"
VALUATION
Dinesh Sairam
Dinesh Sairam
@Dinesh_Sairam
@Gautam__Baid He laid down very similar principles a decade ago in his 1976 letter (Source: https://t.co/6Z5v0qEaIg)

What's amazing is how consistent he's been in following his philosophy even after nearly 5
VALUATION

You May Also Like

Kevin Murphy
Kevin Murphy
@kwmurphy
Okay look - I didn’t grow up with comic books. But I read stacks of science fiction digests and I kit-bashed model cars into fantasy rods, and just tried to maintain a low profile until I could get out of the house. So you could say I’m a distant cousin of the comic book fan. /1

And sometimes one’s childhood passion follows them into adulthood, sometimes not, sometimes as an adult one finds a passion they never had as a child and embraces it. For me, that must include getting involved with a puppet show at the age of thirty. /2

So who’s to say whose passion’s legitimate and whose is bogus? Nobody. Someone might indict your passion but they have no ground to stand on and should be dismissed out of hand. /3

Maybe they’re envious that you have a passion, maybe they think that their passion is cooler than yours, or maybe they’re just insecure, who knows. Doesn’t matter. /4

What matters is that if something gives you joy, and in the process doesn’t hurt others, then by all means follow it. It’s how we explore our secret hopes, our shadow sides, our inner character. /5
CULTURE
Suhas S. Hardutt
Suhas S. Hardutt
@HarduttSuhas
THE BATTLE OF TALIKOTA and the destruction of Vijaynagar (Hampi)
26 January 1565

A tale of valor, deception and decimation.

A grim reminder that if we fail to protect our heritage, it will eventually crumble under the onslaught of "forces of anarchy".
(Elaborate thread)


This decisive battle was fought between the Vijayanagara empire and the Deccan sultanates resulting in a rout of Vijayanagara and ending the last major medieval era Hindu kingdom in south India.(1)

The seeds of 1565 encounter were sown more than 250 years earlier when the forces of the Delhi Sultanate, during the time of Alauddin Khilji and later Md Bin Tughlaq swept through southern India in an expansion spree.(2)

By middle of the 14th century, facing rebellions, Tughlaq withdrew to Delhi, leaving behind 2 empires, Bahmani, which ruled the Deccan from Kalaburagi, and Vijayanagara, which ruled most south India with its capital at Vijayanagar.(3)

The Raichur Doab, between the Krishna and Tungabhadra rivers, existed as a natural boundary between these two kingdoms, with wars often breaking out over control of this territory.(4)
HISTORY
Advertisement
Christina Warren
Christina Warren
@film_girl
A brief thread on Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, the crazy con man who is now claiming to have hacked into the Georgia voting machines in Fulton County. 90s kids and tech aficionados might remember Jovan as the inventor of the CueCat, the dumbest gadget of all time.

Also, for anyone who wants to claim that Jovan Hutton Pulitzer (not his given name, but one he changed legally after the CueCat debacle) invented QR Codes: he did not. Like that other right-wing crazy man who claimed to have invented email, Jovan didn’t invent QR Codes.

He did invent the CueCat, a product that somehow raised $185 million dollars for a tethered barcode scanner for magazines and newspapers, so you could get ads from your ads. As I said, the dumbest product of all time. Good backup barcode scanners after they were hacked, however

Oh, that’s another thing. When CueCat was a thing, its systems were hacked. I guess that’s what makes Jovan a security expert. His bankrupt company from 20 years ago was hacked and widely mocked. He’s a genius.

In recent years, Jovan pivoted to being a treasure hunter who was featured on and widely mocked on Curse of Oak Island, because the man is insane.
POLITICS
EverythingOppresses
EverythingOppresses
@SoOppressed
The first area to focus on is diversity. This has become a dogma in the tech world, and despite the fact that tech is one of the most meritocratic industries in the world, there are constant efforts to promote diversity at the expense of fairness, merit and competency. Examples:

USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the

ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.

Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this

Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
TECH
Maurice Casey
Maurice Casey
@MauriceJCasey
I am reading through reams of late-1920s communist poetry and easily my favourite title so far is: "To a Lady who Rejected a Poem about Spring as a Petit-Bourgeois Deviation"

The last lines:
"So here's my hat into the air,
Three cheers for your amazing hair,
For coal mines, and for turbines, too,
For steel, the Comintern and you!"

A not exactly graceful (though possibly satirical) title: "Lines Disassociating Myself from Yessenin and Supporting the Otherwise Unfounded Legend that I am a Foremost Proletarian Writer"

An excerpt:
"Goodbye verses of Yessenin
Goodbye literary slop-
You are not the line of Lenin
You are not the line of WAPP

Never shall I moan a
simple lyric from the heart
I'll devote my new corona
to the proletarian art"

The poet was Joseph Freeman, who published much of his revolutionary verse in the New Masses, a stylish journal of the interwar American literary Left.
CULTURE