Valiant Organics - 1400>>>1700👍
Valiant Organics - it is in momentum!!
— Moneyspinners-Work 4UR Dreams (@Jai0409) April 27, 2021
It is part of Aarti group!!
Notes, short term and long term charts\U0001f447 https://t.co/gTSl9bLzDX pic.twitter.com/bVFgYwiI2J
More from Moneyspinners-Work 4UR Dreams
A good portfolio stock for this calender year!!
here is the technical chart with approximate lengths
cheers https://t.co/b5plJ1EqxT

In the power sector - recent entries
— Moneyspinners - Work Hard, Dream Big!! (@Jai0409) April 5, 2022
-Tata Power
-Borosil Renewables
will share EW charts, stay tuned
cheers
I love this company biz, would accumulate at lower levels
cheers https://t.co/02SWIrNcay

KPIT - Major wave 2 is in progress, will hold it with stop loss 555!!
— Moneyspinners - Work Hard, Dream Big!! (@Jai0409) April 15, 2022
cheers https://t.co/VykwxWxLpb
Whenever international prices shot up commodity stocks start soaring, previously it went up from 73 to 165!!
Now can it give move to 200/230+!!
Chart👇 https://t.co/1TJRP7rj0P

Good for Hindustan copper and Rain Industries!!
— Moneyspinners-Work 4UR Dreams (@Jai0409) January 18, 2021
Disc - Invested!! https://t.co/xfJKSWMeyw
https://t.co/3An8uq0e3G
Is copper leading the commodity supercycle? @Manisha3005 explains on #CommodityCorner https://t.co/nZ5FT4FsZ2
— CNBC-TV18 (@CNBCTV18News) April 16, 2021
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?