#ULTRACEMCO stock looking bullish, RSI & MACD very strong
Today was results day, volume was very high, if it sustains above 6450, it can rally towards 7080, i.e. 61.8% Fibonacci pullback of last rise
#cement #stocks #nifty
Not trading call, academic post
More from Techno Prince
More from Ultratechcement
Ultratech Cement - Moving up nicely. My target for this: 9000-9100.
SL 7650 https://t.co/KKnf6a6xlH
SL 7650 https://t.co/KKnf6a6xlH
Nifty 100 stocks near BO or a few % up/down from BO levels:
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) September 2, 2021
1. Ultratech Cement
2. Reliance
3. Nestle
4. Abbott India
5. ICICI Lombard
6. IGL
7. Indigo
8. LT
9. Muthoot Finance
10. United Spirits
#ULTRACEMCO -7114.95
6.857% ....7135
#Observation
6.857% ....7135
#Observation
#ULTRACEMCO
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) April 8, 2021
1st image.
6.857% is at 7135. Sustain above this upside projection for long term perspective 11425-18401-29182.
2nd image show current trend Probabilty
#Fibonacci
#Retracement
#Extension
#wave principle pic.twitter.com/Jo5kZ5S0gg
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".