Learn UI/UX Design for FREE 🤩

Thread 🧵

1. Intro to UX

Take an insightful dive into usability — what it means, why it matters, and how you can optimize your product, service, or business

https://t.co/3SMTKjEmwz
2. Adobe UX Foundation Learning Journey -

Start with the Adobe UX Foundation journey for understanding Design concepts - UX process, visual elements, information architecture & navigation

https://t.co/qM6OykXHNw
3. Product Design by Google

Learn product validation, UI/UX practices, Google’s Design Sprint and the process for setting and tracking actionable metrics

https://t.co/OJCBxiLlfp
4. Digital Skills: User Experience by Accenture

Understand the basics of user experience, including what it is and what makes good UX with this online course

https://t.co/HLtfBzpp7t
5. Learn UI Design Fundamentals by Scrimba

This tutorial course will teach you to design user interfaces that both look good and work well

https://t.co/WzIfbSDf60
6. UX Fundamentals by Gymnasium

UX Fundamentals will teach you how to apply user-centric Design Principles in order to improve your Website and Mobile App Design

https://t.co/zTqlRYBbkn
7. Hackdesign

50+ introductory design lessons curated by professionals

https://t.co/QHhJNuemFy
8. Learn Design with Figma

Want to get started in design, but don’t know where to begin? These lessons and exercises will help you start designing immediately

https://t.co/yDLlbjI4nS
9. Introduction to User Experience Design

The focus of this course is to introduce the learner to User Experience (UX) Design for FREE

https://t.co/ZIMVzjaFko
10. UI/UX Design - Video Courses

This another amazing website that offers hundreds of hours of FREE contents including the basics, the design workflow, UI design, and prototyping tools.

https://t.co/kyrmw57Q47
That's it for this thread.

If you find this thread useful 👇

❤️ Like the First Tweet
🚀 Help others to find it by Retweeting
🔥 Follow me for more content like this

Let's learn and grow together 🙏

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?