📱 Over the past 2-3 years, I screenshotted a ton of random tweets about social/product that made me think

Here they are, in chronological order, w highlights from @nikitabier, @BrianNorgard, @rsg, @Mazzeo, @prestonattebery, + many more

(sry for weird twtr cropping + threading)

h/t @Mazzeo
h/t @Mazzeo
h/t @Mazzeo
h/t @Mazzeo
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t @jmj
h/t @ianbroyles
h/t @matthieurouif
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @_DanielSinclair
h/t @schlaf
h/t @naval
h/t @TurnerNovak
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @juliey4
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t @BrianNorgard & @nikitabier
h/t @JeffChang30
h/t @danielrakh
h/t @neilvoss
h/t @scottbelsky
h/t @dtrinh
h/t @rsg
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @jamesbeshara
h/t @jmj
h/t @eugenewei
h/t @basche42
h/t @hamburger
h/t @genmon
h/t @HipCityReg
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t @gregisenberg
h/t Paari
h/t Paari
h/t @rsg
h/t @libovness
h/t @ibringtraffic
h/t @startuployalist
h/t @juliey4
h/t @gregisenberg
h/t @jmj
h/t @BrianNorgard
h/t Paari
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @rohit_jindal29
h/t @rohit_jindal29
h/t @blakeir
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @benrbn/@nikitabier
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @2irl4u
h/t @simonsarris/@kylebrussell
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @prestonattebery
h/t @WillManidis
h/t @prestonattebery
h/t @prestonattebery
h/t @garrytan
h/t @nikitabier
h/t @TurnerNovak
h/t @spinubzilla
h/t @jacksondahl
...and that's it! Have a bunch of screenshots from articles re. social/product, may post another time

Takeaways from this: I should pay @nikitabier and the rest of you for your tweets. Can't believe this website is free!
also: hopefully this is obvious, but this isn't a comprehensive list of everything that's resonated with me on here...the word "random" in the intro tweet was intentional. Plenty of stuff others have said that I think about all the time

More from Twitter

My 10 most popular tweets from 2020

Happy New Year everybody!

[THREAD] ⬇️

1/ Thread on how American Express


2/ Thread on how Coca-Cola makes


3/ Thread explaining popular software


4/ On consistency

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x