Categories Trump
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
Omg...1:35...and 1:43
๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅThereโs TWO Trumps ๐!!! IM NOT KIDDING WATCH it!!!
Behind him and in front! One by the monitors the other by the edge of the tent! ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅThereโs TWO Trumps ๐!!! IM NOT KIDDING WATCH it!!!
Behind him and in front! One by the monitors the other by the edge of the tent! ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
\u5728\u5fb7\u5dde\u56fd\u5bb6\u56fd\u9632\u6307\u6325\u4e2d\u5fc3\uff0c\u770b\u5ddd\u7237\u795e\u6e05\u6c14\u723d\uff0c\u54ea\u91cc\u50cf\u8f93\u6389\u5927\u9009\u7684\u6837\u5b50\uff1f
— \u7d2b\u8afe (@dzjsqy) January 7, 2021
\u8f6c\u673a\u5373\u5c06\u51fa\u73b0\u2757\ufe0f\U0001f64f pic.twitter.com/w1WXpxw9jA
1/ Some of us suspected that Trump would use ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป๐ to enable those ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ ๐ต๐ถ๐บ so that they can be free to ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐น๐ฎ๐ and ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ at Trump's request.
2/ We suspected Trump may threaten those who are not loyal, ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐น๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐. If we allow these pardons to stand, it will send a message that the President, and those loyal to him, are ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐. We cannot allow that precedent to be set.
3/ We must not allow pardons to stop us from investigating, prosecuting, and holding accountable those involved. This includes ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐ต๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐๐.
4/ In the words of Ex-Trump official @MilesTaylorUSA:
https://t.co/SdZbakhJ1D
โHe'd been told, on repeated occasions, that the way he wanted to do it was ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น. His response was to say: โDo it. If you get in trouble ๐'๐น๐น ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐โโฆโ
5/ โThe President ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป U.S. government officials for ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐ to implement his immigration policy.โ
- Miles Taylor @MilesTaylorUSA, August 24,
2/ We suspected Trump may threaten those who are not loyal, ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐น๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐. If we allow these pardons to stand, it will send a message that the President, and those loyal to him, are ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐. We cannot allow that precedent to be set.
3/ We must not allow pardons to stop us from investigating, prosecuting, and holding accountable those involved. This includes ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐ต๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐๐.
4/ In the words of Ex-Trump official @MilesTaylorUSA:
https://t.co/SdZbakhJ1D
โHe'd been told, on repeated occasions, that the way he wanted to do it was ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น. His response was to say: โDo it. If you get in trouble ๐'๐น๐น ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐โโฆโ
5/ โThe President ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป U.S. government officials for ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐ to implement his immigration policy.โ
- Miles Taylor @MilesTaylorUSA, August 24,
@WestJournalism DemoKKKrats just LOVED the BLM/Antifa rioters when they descended upon DC! Nancy Pelosi even Tweeted:
https://t.co/MbXFf5Xc4u
I would like to see Democrats produce even one shred of evidence or just one example of President Trump calling for insurrection. Just one. That's all.
https://t.co/MbXFf5Xc4u
I would like to see Democrats produce even one shred of evidence or just one example of President Trump calling for insurrection. Just one. That's all.
We welcome the presence of these activists, and we strongly urge the Capitol Police to allow them to continue to organize and participate in our democracy.
— Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) November 13, 2018
It was a foregone conclusion that Trump would lose the TX case, but why did he say โThis is the big one?โ 1/9
Because the TX case rested on the proposition that a national election can be nullified and โoverturnedโ (a term Trump actually used in a tweet) on the grounds that it does not satisfy conditions determined by the incumbent president 2/9
and the states governed by that presidentโs political party--
(e..g., no votes by voters receiving mail-in ballots who do not request those ballots shall be deemed legitimate.) 3/9
This litigation was intended to nullify all the votes in all 50 states, and would have called for a new election. It challenged election procedures, not just election results. And it did not require any proof of fraud or undercounts or overcounts. 4/9
In other words, no national election can be legitimate that fails to reelect the incumbent president--in this case of course, Donald J. Trump, the Supreme Leader of the *real* America. 5/9
We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2020
Because the TX case rested on the proposition that a national election can be nullified and โoverturnedโ (a term Trump actually used in a tweet) on the grounds that it does not satisfy conditions determined by the incumbent president 2/9
and the states governed by that presidentโs political party--
(e..g., no votes by voters receiving mail-in ballots who do not request those ballots shall be deemed legitimate.) 3/9
This litigation was intended to nullify all the votes in all 50 states, and would have called for a new election. It challenged election procedures, not just election results. And it did not require any proof of fraud or undercounts or overcounts. 4/9
In other words, no national election can be legitimate that fails to reelect the incumbent president--in this case of course, Donald J. Trump, the Supreme Leader of the *real* America. 5/9