1/ Why Trump Will Weather This Nonsense: "I view the video, and more than 95 percent of the people who made their ways inside clearly were just drifting and roaming around, walking mostly in single or double file, as in a tour of the Capitol."
More from Trump
This is mostly right but strikes me as it needing said that I don't think the left or the intelligentsia have the slightest idea how low institutional trust in anything coming from a left mouthpiece is now. Except in-network, the best heuristic is "the opposite of what they said"
If you look at the situation from a predictive models perspective instead of the more rigorous and appropriate (under normal circumstances) "prove your case or gtfo" perspective, trusting the opposite of whatever the left side says has an AMAZING track record, as we know it.
Literally, the best heuristic most people have right now, in terms of how often it gets things right versus *completely* wrong, is "whatever CNN, the NYT, public health officials, and the Democrats said... yeah, the opposite." That is, they're wrong WAY outside of statistics.
They're also not just wrong. They're *completely* wrong, backwards, often transparently covering something up that they don't want known or refuse to believe. This isn't just a legitimation crisis because there's a heuristic: whatever the official left narrative is, is wrong.
There are a few reasons why such a heuristic would be more predictive than not. One of those is conspiracy, and another is mass hysteria with ideological capture. We know at least one of those is happening and have rather strong evidence both are. That makes conspiracy reasonable
I read part of the transcript of the Trump call.
— Eric Weinstein (@EricRWeinstein) January 4, 2021
The following strikes me.
A) Trump is a true political outsider & the only one to reach the Presidency with zero government experience.
B) There is an obvious open institutional conspiracy to prevent any outsider gaining power.
If you look at the situation from a predictive models perspective instead of the more rigorous and appropriate (under normal circumstances) "prove your case or gtfo" perspective, trusting the opposite of whatever the left side says has an AMAZING track record, as we know it.
Literally, the best heuristic most people have right now, in terms of how often it gets things right versus *completely* wrong, is "whatever CNN, the NYT, public health officials, and the Democrats said... yeah, the opposite." That is, they're wrong WAY outside of statistics.
They're also not just wrong. They're *completely* wrong, backwards, often transparently covering something up that they don't want known or refuse to believe. This isn't just a legitimation crisis because there's a heuristic: whatever the official left narrative is, is wrong.
There are a few reasons why such a heuristic would be more predictive than not. One of those is conspiracy, and another is mass hysteria with ideological capture. We know at least one of those is happening and have rather strong evidence both are. That makes conspiracy reasonable
TS = 4:40 pm
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2020
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?