Let's discuss all of this and take potential arguments and put them out there, and then, for a second, discuss how bad it is that we have to do this.

Someone here, and I cannot find your post, so that's on me; come claim your genius prize, called Trump "Schrodinger's President"

This is because he simultaneously sick and not sick, very ill and mildly ill, all of it, at the same time.

So, scenario 1: He's really sick. In this scenario, we have a really sick fool who didn't wear a mask and who infected basically an entire garden party.
In this scenario, with claims by unreliable liars (including him), everyone got sick and one guy, Grassley, is refusing to test because he wants that judiciary committee to have a quorum.
In this scenario, McConnell, a corrupt a-hole is pulling the Senate until the 18th, to avoid voting on a bill to help ppl in distress but also to protect Senate leaders, except the judiciary committee. Which is convening on the 12th to destroy rights and access to healthcare.
In this scenario, Trump is really sick or very sick or mildly ill, depending on whether you believe the nervous looking doctors on the podium surrounded by goons in white coats who look like bouncers, not physicians.
Scenario 2: Trump is not ill. This is a ploy to gain sympathy because of his tax fraud, desperate desire not to go to jail, and his need to be the center of things. In this scenario, seasoned con artists are continuing their grift by having Trump go hang out at Walter Reed.
This scenario is bolstered by the claim that "he will be released in a few days," because this disease is not like that, but hey, his supporters are really gullible. It is in their best interests to be gullible and some of them drank bleach when he told them to.
In this scenario, he did make those videos (still not live--come on now) but at Walter Reed's where he is being treated for nothing and is hanging out in his cufflinks and regular clothes. This scenario also has the complicated reality of him using oxygen under his mask.
But they are con artists and maybe someone thought this wld be a nice touch. (In the other scenario, he's hiding the oxygen from everyone and not very well.)

Then, there are multiple variations on these scenarios, but notice NONE OF THEM are the stories they are telling us.
And now to my main point: None of it matters. The biggest takeaway is he is a serial liar and we can't believe a thing he says, which is why we're not sure what is going on.

Why would we want someone like that to be our president?

More from Trump

1. Yes, Trump will claim to intend to target GOP senators up for reelection in '22 (like he did to Thune with Kristi Noem) if they don't join in @HawleyMO's sedition on Jan. 6, but the fact is, it's not clear whether Trump will be successful in ANY of those efforts & voting yes


2. to hedge off these threats will also create fissures & fractures for these incumbents among other elements of their party that could complicate their renominations. Indeed, what worries me the most about the potential for the country to slip into @anneapplebaum territory is

3. that what should be robust and intense push back from the party establishment against actually ending democracy- bc that's what Trump's request would do, if it was granted, is fairly muted. What we SHOULD be seeing from the mainstream of the party is threats to strip committee

4. assignments, chairs, privileges, even reelection funds, if anyone gets involved in this bullshit- in the House & the Senate, and the fact that you don't see it is more than a story of McConnell & McCarthy being afraid of Trump & his base. Its a story of receptivity, of the

5. level of receptivity the congressional and party leadership is dealing with both within the rank and file membership of the party and within its donor class, and THAT, my friends, is why you find me so concerned. That, and my decision to finally pull @anneapplebaum's book

You May Also Like