1/ Who are the investors in GBTC?

Why is there a premium?

And what is the sweet trade they’re taking advantage of?

A thread 🧵

2/ Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust made headlines again with their record 1-day addition of 16,244 Bitcoin, adding to their stack of over 630,000 Bitcoin and an AUM of ~$23B. Evidently business is good...So who are their investors? And is GBTC’s premium an incentive or disincentive?
3/ What is the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)?Grayscale owns BTC in the trust & investors buy shares to represent a # of BTC. There’s a 2%/yr fee+a “premium.”The premium is the diff. btwn underlying BTC value(Native Asset Value or “NAV”)vs. mkt price of holdings(what shares cost)
4/ There are 2 layers of investors. There are the base layer investors - accredited investors selected to buy into the private placement of the fund at the “NAV” price aka the price of the underlying BTC value
5/ They can send USD or Bitcoin and receive a # of shares equivalent to the BTC value (0.00094919 BTC/share). One catch is its 1 way - Once you put BTC into the trust, it can’t be redeemed. Investors can sell their shares, but the BTC will remain in the trust and off the market
6/ Base layer investors have a 6 mth lockup b4 they can sell shares in the open mkt to the 2nd layer of investors. These 2nd investors must pay a higher, mkt price for the shares. Again, the “premium” is the diff. btwn price of open market shares vs. underlying BTC priced shares
7/ The largest investor is Three Arrows Capital, which recently increased a $259M position to $1.4B (~6% holding in the trust). They are one of the investors taking advantage of the trade by getting in as a private placement at the base layer of the fund
8/ By investing at NAV, at base layer, their shares are locked for 6 mths but they then sell the shares at the higher mkt price, locking in the premium. The premium historically stays ~20%, but can⬆️in a bull mkt where demand for shares is high (in Dec., it was +40%)
9/ Another investor doing this? Blockfi (~5% shares in the trust). Blockfi will give you 6% return when you lend them BTC, b/c they can then lend your BTC to those like GBTC. In this case, they lend Grayscale the BTC and get in on the fund where they take advantage of the premium
10/ For those 2nd layer investors who buy shares in open mkt, the premium is a magnifying risk. If BTC dips hard then losses deepen b/c you have the NAV (price of BTC) drop AND a drop in the premium you bought. Likewise,if you buy b4 a bull mkt/premium pump,your gains are greater
11/ Why the premium?It's the mkt gap btwn supply/demand. Demand for shares > supply b/c new shares are continuously created,but delayed by the 6 mth lockup.Conversely, ETFs keep premiums in check b/c new shares can be created but have no lockup/trade now,arbitraging premiums away
12/ Why do smaller, 2nd investors accept GBTC premium risk vs. a pure BTC buy? 1) You can buy it easily w/ your traditional brokerage acct 2) You avoid self custody 3) Tax advantages, its IRA eligible 4) If you think there’s a bull run soon you take advantage of the premium pump
13/ Accredited investors obviously have a strong incentive w/ the premium to enter the private placement, but it's more than that. For some institutional investors GBTC is one of the few ways they can gain BTC exposure
14/ Many investment funds have governing charters restricting direct crypto investment and/or they dn’t want to custody BTC. But everyone is able to invest in publicly traded assets,like GBTC,so they get the best of both worlds. Internal regulations allow it & they avoid custody
15/ This won’t last https://t.co/iY4DKjIHuh the mkt matures&there are more options to trade BTC on a public mkt(BTCETF),there will be fewer 2nd investors willing to pay the premium and it will drop to meet lower demand.Then,GBTC will lower the 2% mgmt fee&try to convert to an ETF
16/ TL;DR: The GBTC premium occurs on the 2nd market and provides a very attractive trade for those accredited investors able to join the private placement and invest at Bitcoin’s NAV at the fund’s base level. However, this premium will begin to disappear as the market matures
https://t.co/0EAQeZkcPg

More from Trading

You May Also Like

Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.


After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be
https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year


as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x