On the first day of class, Professor Bazerman announces a game that seems innocuous enough. Waving a twenty-dollar bill in the air, he offers it up for auction.
How even after knowing everything about your work, a series of emotional judgments can place you in a difficult situation.
A thread on how loss Aversion causes us to take irrational decisions-
On the first day of class, Professor Bazerman announces a game that seems innocuous enough. Waving a twenty-dollar bill in the air, he offers it up for auction.
The winner of the auction, of course, wins the bill. But the runner-up must still honor his or her bid,
In other words,this is a situation where second best finishes last. Indeed, at the beginning of the auction, as people sniff out an opportunity to get a $20 bill for a bargain, the hands quickly shoot up, and the auction is officially under way
There is a collective hard swallow. As if sensing the floodwaters rising, the students get jittery.
Without realizing it, the two students with the highest bids get locked in. "One bidder has bid $16 and the other has bid $ 17," Bazerman said.
Up to this point the students were looking to make a quick dollar; now neither one wants to be the sucker who paid good money for nothing.
Like a runaway train, the auction continues, with the bidding going up past $ 18, $19, and $20.
"Of course," reflected Bazerman, "the rest of the group roars with laughter when the bidding goes over $20."
But that's easier said than done. Students are pulled by both the momentum of the auction and the looming loss
The two forces, in turn, feed off each other: commitment to a chosen path inspires additional bids, driving the price up, making the potential loss loom even larger.
Over the years that Bazerman has conducted the experiment, he has never lost a penny (he donates all proceeds to charity).
This example was from the book, Sway.
When you Buy something at 100 , it goes to 110 and you didn’t sell, when it comes back to 105 you cant sell,and then you sell it way lower. because you felt again it will go up.
Traders feel loss 2X the emotions we feel when we are in profits.
How to avoid loss aversion bias-
1. Think of long term instead of short term results.
More from Trader knight
More from Trading
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x