#TITAN Many experts were giving 3k as target when stock price was near 2500 😀
~ Immediate resistance near 2175 level
Weekly ratio chart against #nifty says👇
~Oversold in near term, Bounce to banta hai
~But may underperform against #nifty in next 2-3 months.
More from Pranay Prasun
#ITC Is this last leg of downside or game over?🙆
Key points : 👇
~ RSI breakout retest in weekly chart
~ HH &HL pattern ,Price action still bullish
~ Huge support as per ratio chart.
#CNXFMCG #Nifty
Key points : 👇
~ RSI breakout retest in weekly chart
~ HH &HL pattern ,Price action still bullish
~ Huge support as per ratio chart.
#CNXFMCG #Nifty
#ITC I drilled further by #CNXFMCG index
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) July 3, 2021
Keypoints :
~ Near huge support as per weekly chart
~ #RSI Breakout retest #Ratiochart
Conclusion : Bounceback expected
Timeframe : Weekly , So please avoid daily movement .@piyushchaudhry @gogrithekhabri @Deishma @pratyush_rohit https://t.co/PKbi7mdoam pic.twitter.com/MUWBSX2LlB
#CNXAUTO Now everyone is bullish on AUTO sector 😀
Time to pause ?
Even chart says the samething https://t.co/1OJTjqp0ay
Time to pause ?
Even chart says the samething https://t.co/1OJTjqp0ay
Are we ready for BOOM BOOM in auto sector ?\U0001f9d0#CNXAUTO
— Pranay Prasun (@PranayPrasun) April 2, 2022
~ Weekly ratio chart against #NIFTY indicates bottom and going forward it may outperform \U0001f91e
~ Don't expect quick returns as its weekly chart pic.twitter.com/cUaugZBerL
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
