Twitler has messed up the ordering of my thread.

Anyways. I'll trudge on. Part 2

So far, so bad. Are we facing an inexorable slide into the mud of totalitarianism? Let’s look at some percentages.

“Usually it is only about 30% [of a population that gets] grasped in a mass phenomenon or hypnosis.  An additional 35-45% usually does not want to raise a dissonant voice in the public space because they are scared of the consequences."

26/
"Usually about 70% who shut up – 30% because they are convinced by the mainstream narrative and 40% because they don’t dare to speak out. And then there is an additional 20-25-30% who does not go along with the narrative and says it in certain situations.” (Mattias Desmet)

27/
This being the case, the task of the 20-30% is to persuade the 40% of those who go along with the programme for a quiet life or to fit into social norms; those who give lip-service to the narrative but are not true believers.

28/
Unfortunately, the people who have joined the Covid Cult as a reparative of psychological harms and an unconscious targeted cure for free-floating anxiety, this smaller group, the 30%, are solid gone, never to return.

29/
This evaluation lays out a strategy dissenters can take up in our argumentation; redirect free-floating anxiety and frustration in the undecided 40% from Covid to the greater danger; the totalitarianism which inevitably leads to terrible outcomes.

30/
Totalitarianism destroys societies, cultures, countries, and ultimately itself on the way. Ignore the 30% of irrational Branch Covidian cultists. The historical evidence is clear. Totalitarianism is far more scary than Covid.

31/
An alternative and more important narrative must highlight totalitarianism, fascism, and the technocratic biosecurity state as the very worst possible outcomes, much worse than a pathogen with a high survival and recovery rate.

32/

You May Also Like

🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"
First thread of the year because I have time during MCO. As requested, a thread on the gods and spirits of Malay folk religion. Some are indigenous, some are of Indian origin, some have Islamic


Before I begin, it might be worth explaining the Malay conception of the spirit world. At its deepest level, Malay religious belief is animist. All living beings and even certain objects are said to have a soul. Natural phenomena are either controlled by or personified as spirits

Although these beings had to be respected, not all of them were powerful enough to be considered gods. Offerings would be made to the spirits that had greater influence on human life. Spells and incantations would invoke their


Two known examples of such elemental spirits that had god-like status are Raja Angin (king of the wind) and Mambang Tali Arus (spirit of river currents). There were undoubtedly many more which have been lost to time

Contact with ancient India brought the influence of Hinduism and Buddhism to SEA. What we now call Hinduism similarly developed in India out of native animism and the more formal Vedic tradition. This can be seen in the multitude of sacred animals and location-specific Hindu gods