More from MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER
Probability towards 4.618% and beyond..
#Possibility
#LTI -4145
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) July 14, 2021
Near term base Case (4024)
Look for 4.618% and 6.857%
Long term perspective Fibonacci extension shown in chart. #Perspective pic.twitter.com/Pyl0aGYIuS
Objective is to move higher towards
3.618% - 4.236% and 4.618%
#Probability
#IEX
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) April 20, 2021
On sustain rise above 347 upside shown in chart up to 4.618%(521)
And 6.857%(718).
View valid till 233 not violated. @UdayJad39389920 pic.twitter.com/I2MoPlwXRW
#ASIANPAINT-2931
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) March 3, 2022
Trend down.
Weekly chart. Fibonacci retracement level shown in chart.
Near term 0.236% and 0.382% Fibonacci retracement level likely to be tested.#Perspective pic.twitter.com/cWJ0qaqDhK
What a beautiful picture
#Wow
एक कलर #लाल भी है

More from Tataconsumer
You May Also Like
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...

... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Ivor Cummins BE (Chem) is a former R&D Manager at HP (sourcre: https://t.co/Wbf5scf7gn), turned Content Creator/Podcast Host/YouTube personality. (Call it what you will.)
— Steve (@braidedmanga) November 17, 2020
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9

Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x

Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq

As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".