The magic of StockEdge combination scans is that it takes into account the Bullish signs from many aspects!
(🧵): https://t.co/6tUmyhrw47
Use Code PREMIUM20 for 20% OFF!
More from StockEdge
One of our users submitted a special Scan:
A THREAD(🧵)....(1/7)
This Combo scan tries to filter stocks based on strong momentum for short term trades
(2/7)
The first scan used here is Close Above Last Week High
https://t.co/ehv5ke8sxc
(3/7)
The Second Scan in the combo is RSI Crossed above 70 https://t.co/q4NpyFYuBD
(4/7)
The Third Scan used here is RSI Overbought Zone https://t.co/5uZxwnLAUD
(5/7)
A THREAD(🧵)....(1/7)
This Combo scan tries to filter stocks based on strong momentum for short term trades
(2/7)
The first scan used here is Close Above Last Week High
https://t.co/ehv5ke8sxc
(3/7)
The Second Scan in the combo is RSI Crossed above 70 https://t.co/q4NpyFYuBD
(4/7)
The Third Scan used here is RSI Overbought Zone https://t.co/5uZxwnLAUD
(5/7)
More from Stockedge
StockEdge Presents: Strong RS Stocks With Squeeze Eruption: A Special Combination Scan!
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame.
It also identities stocks that have consolidated in a narrow range for some time and breaks the zone with a higher trade & delivery quantity.
Some of the scans used in the combination include
-Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity https://t.co/9CiSwEADrF
The second scan used here is Stocks Outperforming Benchmark Index in both 1 week and 3 month: https://t.co/dv9e3KK810
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame.
It also identities stocks that have consolidated in a narrow range for some time and breaks the zone with a higher trade & delivery quantity.
Some of the scans used in the combination include
-Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity https://t.co/9CiSwEADrF
The second scan used here is Stocks Outperforming Benchmark Index in both 1 week and 3 month: https://t.co/dv9e3KK810
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x