What is Relative Strength and how can it be used for trading?
Learn all about this Momentum Indicator: https://t.co/5KcE7kY6cp
#technicalanalysis #trading #rsi
More from StockEdge
The magic of StockEdge combination scans is that it takes into account the Bullish signs from many aspects!
(🧵): https://t.co/6tUmyhrw47
Stocks with a High Delivery, combined with a Close Within 52 week Zone are signs of strong momentum! https://t.co/arNYJst06d
Relative Strength is a momentum indicator which signifies the ratio of a stock price performance compared to the market average performance:
Both Adaptive Relative Strength(ARS) and Static Relative Strength(SRS) above zero confirms its performance as better than Benchmark indexes!
Want to filter such stocks? Subscribe to StockEdge Premium and get these with a few clicks: https://t.co/5hmmLuqUFI
Use Code PREMIUM20 for 20% OFF!
(🧵): https://t.co/6tUmyhrw47
Stocks with a High Delivery, combined with a Close Within 52 week Zone are signs of strong momentum! https://t.co/arNYJst06d
Relative Strength is a momentum indicator which signifies the ratio of a stock price performance compared to the market average performance:
Both Adaptive Relative Strength(ARS) and Static Relative Strength(SRS) above zero confirms its performance as better than Benchmark indexes!
Want to filter such stocks? Subscribe to StockEdge Premium and get these with a few clicks: https://t.co/5hmmLuqUFI
Use Code PREMIUM20 for 20% OFF!
#StockEdge Presents: The Jwala : A Special Combination Scan!
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices & Sectoral Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame which has given multi-year breakout, with higher trade and delivery quantity.
Some of the scans use in the combination include
Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity: https://t.co/EL5Qei0mnp
The second scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Benchmark Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/pcMzVXMbdO
The third scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Sectoral Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/ajJ8jIatdo
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices & Sectoral Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame which has given multi-year breakout, with higher trade and delivery quantity.
Some of the scans use in the combination include
Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity: https://t.co/EL5Qei0mnp
The second scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Benchmark Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/pcMzVXMbdO
The third scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Sectoral Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/ajJ8jIatdo
More from Rs
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
