THREAD: 10 significant things that the best startup founders get right.

(From my notes helping 400+ founders grow their startups.)

The smartest people I’ve met:

They retrain their minds to enjoy being wrong.

They get a dopamine hit when proven wrong because they’re excited to be closer to the truth. The truth is addictive.

In contrast, if you refuse to lose a debate, your brain keeps running old firmware.
I don’t know one highly effective person who isn’t strongly biased toward taking action.

They defer the stuff that doesn’t matter, and they always finish the stuff that does.

It's about rate of iteration and persistence, not brilliance.
The successful people I know have mastered delayed gratification:

They let themselves feel a dopamine hit when they do something that makes their future selves better.

They've learned to value their future self as much as their present self.
Success in life really appears to be two things:

1. Point yourself in the right direction.

2. Do the work even when you're not in the mood to.

(And privilege.)
There are 3 ways to approach projects:

1. Craftsperson: Satisfaction comes from making something the best it can be.

2. Artist: Satisfaction comes from capturing part of yourself.

3. Passenger: Not about satisfaction—just a means to an end.

Know which you are. Lean into it.
Luck is a function of surface area.

You increase your odds by exposing yourself to more opportunities and more people.

There’s a reason why successful people tend to be proactive and resourceful.

They’re extending their reach.

Reach is a serendipity engine.
Smart people focus on what compounds in life:

• Investing money
• Building an audience
• Leaning in when you're wrong
• Making decisions using mental models
• Building deeper relationships with interesting people

You’ll regret not having started these in a year from now.
Ultimately, effective people share three traits:

1. Bias toward taking action. No lazy deferring.

2. Always looking to prove themselves wrong.

3. Regularly reassess their priorities without any fear of changing them.

Key: They balance progress with indulging curiosity.
Also, smart founders tend to understand the basics of online privacy 😂
To learn what smart *content* creators have in common, read the pinned tweet on my profile: @julian

That pinned tweet walks through what makes writers, YouTubers, and TikTokers creatively successful.

Follow me for a big thread next week.

More from Julian Shapiro

THREAD: I've helped 200+ startups grow their newsletters.

Email marketing tactics 👇

People reflexively ignore welcome emails after signup.

• Delay welcome emails by 45min to bypass this reflex

• Send the email from a person—not the business. Julian Shapiro is more human than
https://t.co/8y68CQzBOR

• Use unique subjects:
👎 Welcome
👍 Grammerly = Bye Typos

Make it seamless to refer

• Remind readers at the end of each issue that they can refer others. Include a link.

• Have a web version of every issue so they can be easily shared outside of email

• Consider rewards: Send a monthly bonus issue for referring 5 friends

SEO can be a vanity metric if it doesn't convert to leads.

• Offer readers quizzes to identify the best products for them. Require an email to see results.

• Create Buyer's Guides: Make PDFs with nice visuals to help readers learn skills. Require an email.

When pitching your newsletter on your site:

• Show a sample issue on the page. Prove how high quality your content is.

• Give them control over how often they get emailed. Some want weekly, but others REALLY want monthly. High volume can burn you and your readers out.

More from Startup

Every single time I set foot in every store/restaurant/place of business in Latin America. Only if they are not completely ignoring me from jump. Or following me bc obviously I came to carry out my plans to rob a store that is approximately 2 sq ft. big.


The part that’s also relevant is I’m oftentimes viewed as respectable-negro adjacent in the dominant culture imaginary. So what of those who are never identified as such? I always think about that. I get surveyed & harassed bad...yet and still there’s levels to the profiling.

When I have to do errands in Panama City, I make sure to apply makeup, perfume, an outfit with cleavage, or booty emphasis, heels and an “expensive” purse. There are STARK differences in the service and treatment I get when I do this vs. when I don’t. STARK. Pero, *STARK.*

LatinAmerica is psychotic in identifying who has money and who doesn’t based on how they are dressed, and how they imagine, carrying themselves. An “elegantly dressed” Black person will face less violence on an errand-run versus one who isn’t. This isn’t absolute so sit down plis

And then the times when I am dressed super-revealing. All of the help and care in the world from male workers. The same white mestizo men who would ordinarily follow me to “prevent theft” are happily helping me find things. Again, race, color, gender, class and more.

You May Also Like

1/ Some initial thoughts on personal moats:

Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.

Characteristics of a personal moat below:


2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.

As Andrew Chen noted:


3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized

Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than


4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.

After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.

5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.

In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW