Categories Society
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
There's just zero leadership within the Democratic establishment.
It's a party run by an entrenched, aging cadre of folks who have been around forever *because* they never made waves or rocked the boat.
I say "aging" not to be down on elders, but because the elders in the establishment have not built up any meaningful back bench of younger leaders and actively fight emerging young leaders.
The problem isn't the presence of elders, it's the absence of any sort of age diversity.
In lieu of accepting a diversity of age in leadership in a way that would allow for younger voices to be represented, they pay a small universe of privileged younger operatives to tell them what they want to hear-- that they can win young people with slick, empty marketing.
That's how you get a campaign like HRC in 2020, with its attempt to replace actual attention to millennial generation issues with a slick and often cringey hard push on celebrity surrogacy (and perpetual mom-trying-to-do-instagram vibes).
It's condescending, it's misguided, and we see it in every jokey Biden White House press release.
The playbook is, be 2007 Obama without making any of the bold promises that millennials naively assumed 2007 Obama was making (explicitly and implicitly).
It's a party run by an entrenched, aging cadre of folks who have been around forever *because* they never made waves or rocked the boat.
I want to ask everyone a favor, & that is to please drop all assumptions that Democrats are making politically astute decisions that serve the best interest of Americans. That\u2019s not what\u2019s happening.
— Unite in justice for the poor & oppressed (@BreeNewsome) February 13, 2021
I say "aging" not to be down on elders, but because the elders in the establishment have not built up any meaningful back bench of younger leaders and actively fight emerging young leaders.
The problem isn't the presence of elders, it's the absence of any sort of age diversity.
In lieu of accepting a diversity of age in leadership in a way that would allow for younger voices to be represented, they pay a small universe of privileged younger operatives to tell them what they want to hear-- that they can win young people with slick, empty marketing.
That's how you get a campaign like HRC in 2020, with its attempt to replace actual attention to millennial generation issues with a slick and often cringey hard push on celebrity surrogacy (and perpetual mom-trying-to-do-instagram vibes).
It's condescending, it's misguided, and we see it in every jokey Biden White House press release.
The playbook is, be 2007 Obama without making any of the bold promises that millennials naively assumed 2007 Obama was making (explicitly and implicitly).
Since it is a lovely peaceful Saturday morning, I clearly have to rectify that. Therefore: the World Rugby Transgender Policy and Nye Bevan.
Thread.
This is the WR policy, and explanation by Ross Tucker, who was part of the Working Group. I presented to the Workshop in February on liability, but wasn’t part of the Working Group itself. It’s worth reading this before going further.
And this is the statue of Nye Bevan in Cardiff. Anyone who goes to matches in Cardiff knows it. It’s right by the Castle; more importantly, it’s right by the Rummer. Please God, we’ll get back to see it on a match day soon.
However, what I'm talking about here isn't his comment that he learnt everything he needed to know about politics by dealing with rugby committees, but the one that made the title of the last decent Manic Street Preachers album:
"This is my truth, tell me yours."
What has struck me in the debate/flame-war over the proposed policy is that a large part of this is conflicting truths.
I know that sounds impossible. The truth is the truth is the truth, right? There can only be one truth, not truths, right?
Wrong. Here's why.
Thread.
This is the WR policy, and explanation by Ross Tucker, who was part of the Working Group. I presented to the Workshop in February on liability, but wasn’t part of the Working Group itself. It’s worth reading this before going further.
The World Rugby Transgender guideline is now out, and fully available here: https://t.co/RUZ7QrlodQ You\u2019ll also find a document called FAQs which tries to answer some common questions. We firmly believe it is the right thing in an emotive issue, for many reasons.
— Ross Tucker (@Scienceofsport) October 9, 2020
And this is the statue of Nye Bevan in Cardiff. Anyone who goes to matches in Cardiff knows it. It’s right by the Castle; more importantly, it’s right by the Rummer. Please God, we’ll get back to see it on a match day soon.

However, what I'm talking about here isn't his comment that he learnt everything he needed to know about politics by dealing with rugby committees, but the one that made the title of the last decent Manic Street Preachers album:
"This is my truth, tell me yours."
What has struck me in the debate/flame-war over the proposed policy is that a large part of this is conflicting truths.
I know that sounds impossible. The truth is the truth is the truth, right? There can only be one truth, not truths, right?
Wrong. Here's why.
Saw this paper on floating on the TL and decided to take a break from death by R™️
A lot to unpack...but we’re in the middle of a pancetta so I’m gonna leave most of it in the bag 🧵
https://t.co/XrV77u6rUp
I almost quit after the section on “Racial Categorizations in the United States” b/c it oversimplifies & inaccurately recounts the history of census racial designations.
(No “Black” or “Native” in the 8/2/1790 census, btw. Indigenous ppl were first counted in the 1860 census)
Many weren’t “white” until coming to the US & many immigrated to access “whiteness”
The US census can’t be used to demonstrate the merits of race as a proxy for biology or ancestry - white is a group for the non-Black/non-othered & includes Northern European & North African folx
The authors then refer to ethnicity as a way to capture “common values, cultural norms”
The oversimplification is offensive. Hispanic/Latino is not a monolithic grouping of people. The authors even show in (figure 1) how different ancestry can be *within* this ethnic group.
That difference in ancestry translates to VERY different cultures in terms of food, customs, & even language. Sociopolitical relations also translate to different ways that people are treated based on the precise origins of their Hispanic identity.
A lot to unpack...but we’re in the middle of a pancetta so I’m gonna leave most of it in the bag 🧵
https://t.co/XrV77u6rUp

I almost quit after the section on “Racial Categorizations in the United States” b/c it oversimplifies & inaccurately recounts the history of census racial designations.
(No “Black” or “Native” in the 8/2/1790 census, btw. Indigenous ppl were first counted in the 1860 census)
The 1790 census grouped people as free white men, free white women, other free persons and slaves without a specific race question. Then 100 years, the crazy had reached a peak with White, Black and three gradations of white/black admixture in between.
— Lachelle Dawn (@Lachelle_Dawn) June 3, 2020
Many weren’t “white” until coming to the US & many immigrated to access “whiteness”
The US census can’t be used to demonstrate the merits of race as a proxy for biology or ancestry - white is a group for the non-Black/non-othered & includes Northern European & North African folx
The authors then refer to ethnicity as a way to capture “common values, cultural norms”
The oversimplification is offensive. Hispanic/Latino is not a monolithic grouping of people. The authors even show in (figure 1) how different ancestry can be *within* this ethnic group.
That difference in ancestry translates to VERY different cultures in terms of food, customs, & even language. Sociopolitical relations also translate to different ways that people are treated based on the precise origins of their Hispanic identity.
Are you interested in having a great experience with a high-quality escort in the US? Here's a handy guide on how and where to look, things to watch out for, etiquette, things she'll expect of you, etc.
1. Where to look
https://t.co/dKQvqzeb6F is my top recommend. Great searching, treats escorts well, high volume
Slixa and Eros are also good, but would recommend Eros as a last resort, only if you have low amounts of escorts in your area and can't find any on other sites.
For escorts, price is def correlated with quality. The median rate of escorts is usually around $3-500/hr, but usually is higher in bigger/wealthier US cities. The higher the price, the lower volume (amount of clients she sees per week) she's likely to be, very roughly speaking.
2. Read her website. She might have common questions answered. Sometimes photos are more flattering than she'll look irl - my clients often cited 30-50% of girls they met, looked like their photos. She typically will have an email or a scheduling form.
3. Most established girls want references from other girls you've seen. If you don't have this yet, you'll probably have to give her proof of your income and identity so she can run it through blacklists to check. If she doesn't do this, this is a red flag for your safety too.
1. Where to look
https://t.co/dKQvqzeb6F is my top recommend. Great searching, treats escorts well, high volume
Slixa and Eros are also good, but would recommend Eros as a last resort, only if you have low amounts of escorts in your area and can't find any on other sites.
For escorts, price is def correlated with quality. The median rate of escorts is usually around $3-500/hr, but usually is higher in bigger/wealthier US cities. The higher the price, the lower volume (amount of clients she sees per week) she's likely to be, very roughly speaking.
2. Read her website. She might have common questions answered. Sometimes photos are more flattering than she'll look irl - my clients often cited 30-50% of girls they met, looked like their photos. She typically will have an email or a scheduling form.
3. Most established girls want references from other girls you've seen. If you don't have this yet, you'll probably have to give her proof of your income and identity so she can run it through blacklists to check. If she doesn't do this, this is a red flag for your safety too.
Hi @WDCouncil @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk
The Equal Opportunities Form in your job application has 'gender' in a list of what appears to be the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010.
cc @macca808 @SundayTimesScot
1/13
'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
Sex is the protected characteristic under the Act, but that is not on your list.
2/13
You then ask "How would you describe your gender?" with options:
Female
Male.
3/13
Again, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
4/13
Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology, but you don't ask for that.
https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
5/13
The Equal Opportunities Form in your job application has 'gender' in a list of what appears to be the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010.
cc @macca808 @SundayTimesScot
1/13

'Gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
Sex is the protected characteristic under the Act, but that is not on your list.
2/13

You then ask "How would you describe your gender?" with options:
Female
Male.
3/13
Again, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.
https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u
4/13

Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology, but you don't ask for that.
https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF
'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.
5/13
