Wages, profits, and rents have “natural rates” regulated by the general conditions of the society in which they exist. (I.vii.1) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

When the price of any commodity = price of rent + profit + labor + price of getting it to market, the commodity is sold at its “natural price.” (I.vii.4–5) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
And that all means the commodity has been sold for what it is worth—what it really costs. (I.vii.5) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
The price for which a commodity is sold ought to include a seller’s profit, because that’s how sellers pay themselves, just like they pay the wages of the laborers who work for them, who get their goods to market, etc. (I.vii.5) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweet
Nerds among you may recognize the concept of economic profit here: it matters to the owners of stock whether they could have done better by using their stock elsewhere, not just whether they covered their costs. (I.vii.5) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets #WeLoveNerds
A seller might technically be able to sell for less, but is unlikely to do so for long, because if there’s no payment to seller, he’ll just go into another business. (I.vii.6) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Market price—which is what’s on the price tag—can be above or below or the same as the “natural price.” (I.vii.7) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
There’s a difference between consumer demand and effectual demand. You can want all kinds of things, but unless you can pay, your demand isn’t effectual. This is why no one is building the SmithTweeters a house by the ocean. Yet. (I.vii.8–9) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
If lots of people want something and are able to pay for it, the price will go up, particularly as an item becomes scarce. This is because of competition between buyers. (I.vii.9) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
When there’s lots of something, and people don’t want as much of it, the price goes down as sellers compete to get rid of excess goods (especially if they're perishable). (I.vii.10) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
(Don’t you economist types have a graph for this, or something?) #SupplyAndDemand #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
No big deal this is just market dynamics helping prices tend toward their "natural" level. Google might try to tell you that Cournot invented equilibrium price in 1838 BUT HERE IT IS IN SMITH IN 1776, Y'ALL! (I.vii.11–15) #WeHaveOurOwnFun #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
The trick is to try to bring to market the right amount of the right commodities at the right time, and this is harder for some commodities than others (I.vii.15–19) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
“A publick mourning raises the price of black cloth.” Most emo Smith quote ever. (I.vii.19) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
We wonder what Smith would think about the fight over the blackest black and the pinkest pink? (I.vii.22) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
https://t.co/D0MvQyL1iK
Producers who are lucky or who can keep a secret might be able to sell above the natural price on an ongoing basis, but generally competition pushes prices back down. (I.vii.20–25) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
Monopolies? Smith hates ‘em. (I.vii.26–29) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
And here’s the plan for the next 4 chapters: wages; profit; the proportion between labor and stock; land rents. Stay tuned, Smith fans! We’ll see you tomorrow. (I.vii.33–37) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

More from @AdamSmithWorks

More from Society

The Nashville Operation - A Battle in the War

A thread exploring the Nashville bombing in the context of the 2020 Digital War (via SolarWinds) against the United States perpetrated by our enemies, likely China, Iran and/or Russia.


SolarWinds Hack

A digital "Pearl Harbor" moment for the United States, whoever was responsible had access to the keys to the kingdom for months during 2020, including sensitive military infrastructure. This is war!

SunGard + SolarWinds

SolarWinds software company is owned by same company that owns SunGard, which essentially provides data center services. A secure place to host internet servers with redundant power and "big pipe" data connections.

https://t.co/U3P3SrrkM1


SunGard Data Center

In Nashville, around the corner from their "big pipe" connection, AT&T. Like any data center, highly secure. Only authorized personnel can enter, and even fewer can access the actual server rooms. Backup generators are available in case of power failure.


If the SunGard hardware was being used to "host" critical command and control software related to SolarWinds, the US powers would be very interested in gaining special access keys that are stored on the hard-drives of specific servers.
Brief thread to debunk the repeated claims we hear about transmission not happening 'within school walls', infection in school children being 'a reflection of infection from the community', and 'primary school children less likely to get infected and contribute to transmission'.

I've heard a lot of scientists claim these three - including most recently the chief advisor to the CDC, where the claim that most transmission doesn't happen within the walls of schools. There is strong evidence to rebut this claim. Let's look at


Let's look at the trends of infection in different age groups in England first- as reported by the ONS. Being a random survey of infection in the community, this doesn't suffer from the biases of symptom-based testing, particularly important in children who are often asymptomatic

A few things to note:
1. The infection rates among primary & secondary school children closely follow school openings, closures & levels of attendance. E.g. We see a dip in infections following Oct half-term, followed by a rise after school reopening.


We see steep drops in both primary & secondary school groups after end of term (18th December), but these drops plateau out in primary school children, where attendance has been >20% after re-opening in January (by contrast with 2ndary schools where this is ~5%).

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?