@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 This was in Psychiatric Times: https://t.co/nnIzbeBcJT
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 This is from a uni counseling center, and is a good overview of gendered victim-blaming for male victims: https://t.co/Z0OfchkhbB
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 This is tangentially about male victims of sex crimes and discusses gendered bonding and what men can admit. https://t.co/i39UPRWtU4
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 Finally, RAINN has a summary, similar in theme to the UTK counseling center above: https://t.co/LnHEz7GxHS
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 The issue isn't "are men victimized?" (yes). It's, sex crimes are gendered: the feelings of shame *differ* for male and female survivors.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 The Canadian link delves the deepest into coping mechanisms, and they're incredibly gendered, and therapists should recognize this.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 Oh, and even though it's not about men, here are some resources about lesbian abuse survivors - because, again, this is gendered.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 This paper is quantitative and not qualitative, but, it finds abused lesbians experience internalized homophobia. https://t.co/138u7bXfet
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 Here's a 2-page brochure, mentioning the queer-specific abuser tactic, "sleep with me to prove you're really queer." https://t.co/z4dnJ6wyWj
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 RAINN again mentions queer survivors, and it's useful to compare-and-contrast with their page for male survivors. https://t.co/VIhwZAtHMw
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 Finally, IHE has an article with a few examples of queer sexual assault on US uni campuses. https://t.co/o0guPLtVp2
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 I bring all of this up because to me at least, the natural segue from descriptive statistics is to talk about the victims and their needs.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 The emergent picture from most of the links (and the literal text of the Canadian study) is that victims experience it in a gendered way.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 And in particular, therapists need to recognize this and not just search-and-replace what they know of M/f victims to M/m, F/m, F/f, or ?/?.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 So now that I've stopped talking about the interesting topic that is sexual assault, let's transition to the less interesting topic of SSC.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 SSC *did not do any of this*. That post led with descriptive statistics and then segued to mocking #MeToo.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 And as it happens, even that meta mockery is wrong. The post was written more than a month after the revelations about Kevin Spacey.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 SSC's worst problem is, it discusses topical social issues rarely and shallowly. That's too blue/red tribe. It prefers meta-commentary.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 It replicates normal punditry this way, except that pundits love the media that they work in and SSC's community hates the media.
@ondakondratiev @PlzBeSensible @mattyglesias @Burgerfacemcta1 @threadreaderapp unroll

More from Society

global health policy in 2020 has centered around NPI's (non-pharmaceutical interventions) like distancing, masks, school closures

these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science.

this was never true and that fact was known and knowable.

let's look.


above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another.

we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths.

this is devastating to the case for NPI.


clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality.

barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.

this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science.

there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.

this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses.

everyone got the same R

You May Also Like