1/ Thread
@rak3re aptly identifies a sudden shift in global consensus in early March, which led to endless lockdowns. But it’s vital to realize this shift didn’t just happen; the CCP launched an entire campaign of propaganda and fraudulent science to bring it about. Let’s recap.

2/ In late Feb., WHO was dazzled by China: “China’s uncompromising and rigorous use of non-pharmaceutical measures to contain transmission of the COVID-19 virus in multiple settings provides vital lessons for the global response”
https://t.co/nMCXBYphrz
https://t.co/dkxeEySuVH
3/ In a press conference, Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO’s China mission, told the press: “What China has demonstrated is, you have to do this. If you do it, you can save lives and prevent thousands of cases of what is a very difficult disease.”
https://t.co/KpAqMTKnEM
4/ Two days later, in an interview for China Central Television (CCTV), Aylward (who later disconnected a live interview when asked about Taiwan) put it bluntly: “Copy China’s response to COVID-19.”
https://t.co/MmAJ5Tqq7N
5/ @NYTimes immediately lapped up the WHO’s February report: “China ‘took one of the most ancient strategies and rolled out one of the most ambitious, agile and aggressive disease-containment efforts in history.’”
https://t.co/10RfPWS0Fb
6/ Tom Frieden—who has extensive China ties and supported Tedros knowing of his cholera coverups—echoed WHO, telling CNN on Feb 25: “China’s extraordinary cordon of Hubei province and other areas bought the world at least a month of lead time to prepare.”
https://t.co/TgKDMbfasi
7/ Days later, a team from Imperial College, “China’s best academic partner in the west,” led by Neil Ferguson ran a computer model forecasting 2.2 million people in the U.S. would die of COVID, and recommended months of lockdowns.
https://t.co/VxSzkcS46M
https://t.co/nAG5EUtpeZ
8/ Neil Ferguson recalled how China inspired him:

“It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe … And then Italy did it. And we realised we could… If China had not done it, the year would have been very different.”
https://t.co/0BV3NKLcZ8
9/ Days later, the WHO released guidance citing Chinese journal articles claiming that “Chinese expert consensus” called for “invasive mechanical ventilation” as the “first choice” for people with respiratory distress.
https://t.co/EF9UxBerrf
10/ Chinese journal articles even claimed the coronavirus was so brand-spankin’ novel that, unlike other viruses, it could spread asymptomatically. Per WHO: “Early data from China suggested that people without symptoms could infect others.”
https://t.co/qgJPDOFKAf
11/ On March 4, Bar-Yam et al launched the website https://t.co/UHVGRLZD4m, which was quickly translated into 17 languages, urging countries around the world to emulate China's lockdowns.
https://t.co/f9xmtnGziE
12/ On March 10, Tomas Pueyo published an article that instantly went viral, urging leaders to emulate China and clairvoyantly predicting that “in 2 to 4 weeks” the “entire world” would be “in lockdown,” even though WHO hadn’t yet declared a pandemic.
https://t.co/vY2hlHxvKd
13/ At that same time, the entire world was suddenly bombarded with propaganda extolling China’s draconian lockdown measures.
https://t.co/BEOkiFXq6U
14/ Beginning March 12, hundreds of thousands of state-sponsored social media posts admired China’s lockdowns and demanded governments around the world emulate them, denigrating countries and leaders who failed to follow.
15/ Beginning March 13, Boris Johnson’s Twitter feed was stormed by suspicious accounts likening his initial herd-immunity-focused plan to genocide.
16/ Chinese state media conspicuously and simultaneously echoed the exact same sentiments of the bots storming Boris Johnson’s feed, on March 14 describing “herd immunity” as a “strategy” violating “human rights.”
https://t.co/RotxKiKNnz
17/ Chinese state media simultaneously bombarded Facebook with ads advertising China’s pandemic response, all of which ran without Facebook’s required political disclaimer.
https://t.co/4Xs295P6z2
18/ When Italy became the first country outside China to lock down, Chinese experts arrived on March 12 and two days later advised a tighter lockdown: “There are still too many people and behaviors on the street to improve.”
https://t.co/l0x0MybNXI
19/ On March 15, bots began wildly sharing a YouTube video they called a "message from the future" showing Italians with "a message to themselves from 10 days prior" gaining 8,300,000 views.

It said, "the US, England, France, Spain and Germany are about 9-10 days behind Italy"
20/ And that’s just the evidence we know so far, which likely barely scratches the surface of the shenanigans that took place. For example, there was likely just as much influence and collaboration taking place in foreign languages.
21/ All this took place between Feb 24 and March 15. So we don’t have to scratch our heads as to how the consensus to copy China’s lockdowns emerged so rapidly in those days. We know.

The rest is human psychology.
/end
https://t.co/hb1QuIV7En

More from Society

The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW

You May Also Like

So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.