I'm going to have to draw the line here. And, that's in reaction to a piece from, of all people, Greg Sargent - whom I regard as perhaps the @washingtonpost's top regular political columnist.
A text search shows the words "Christian","evangelical","fundamentalist" are absent...
Marjorie Taylor Greene approved of executing Dems, yet she'll get little to no punishment. But the story here is much bigger: GOP failure to police extremists goes back half a century.
— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) January 28, 2021
\u201cThe dictum now is \u2018No enemies to the right,'" @RuleandRuin tells me:https://t.co/DTlzGomy5h
See, I knew that would happen. It was transactional...
And it was so. In early 2017 I wrote this: https://t.co/mabl2EQnem
Over the next few years, covering Drollinger's thingy become quite a media cottage industry. Predictably, none of the pieces mentioned mine
Many in the horde who stormed the US Capitol would have been (probably quite unaware) under Rushdoony's ideological sway. And there was another major influence in play as well...
This is because coverage of the Christian right has been so thin, and patchy, so a very old piece might be..
Covering the planned January 6th rally (which became a coup attempt) journalist Bob Smietana, writing for Christianity Today, noted the planned "Jericho March": https://t.co/ZpQ2QqItpG
Without getting bogged down in endless details., what you to know is that these rituals are quite new, and associated with...
Top scholars who study this movement, technically known as the "3rd Wave"...
The 3rd Wave is as radically different from traditional Christianity as was (and is) the Church of the Latter Days Saints (the Mormon Church.
A definitive academic reference work for global Christianity, laid down 2 decades ago, is "World Christian Trends AD30 - AD2200"
According to this work, by the year 2000 there were 295 million Third Wave Christians globally...
In the late 90s, leaders in the 3rd Wave began to organize their movement, starting to give it the very rough framework...
And there were prophets, too, who talked directly to god & got specific teachings and instructions.
One key figure who helped pull this whole NAR thing together was an evangelist named C. Peter Wagner, who started out his..
The end product is the 3rd Wave, whose prophets can literally receive
Now, imagine wielding that power as *a political weapon*.
Because that's exactly how the NAR uses it.
BUT, he told them, *our prophets tell us it's wrong*.
And, I know just who one of those prophets is.
So, how do you think people in Wagner's & Engle's movement...
I have no indication whatsoever that the producers of "Jesus Camp" had the faintest inkling of who Lou Engle *really* was, nor did anybody with any size megaphone anywhere (except people in the NAR, of course.)
As I said, there were two main tendencies at work - one, very diffuse but *very* pervasive were the ideas of Rushdoony & his Christian Reconstructionists.
Now, remember that memo, from...
Well, I cross referenced the names from the CNP committee that sent DeVos the memo, and quite a few of them were associated with the "Coalition on Revival" the true significance of which was..
We know this, in part, because one of the top leaders in COR, a highly entertaining raconteur of a man named Colonel V. Doner...
COR very efficiently spread CR ideas widely among fundamentalists and evangelicals...
One key group that COR spread CR ideas to were the charismatics. C. Peter Wagner (a new convert to charismania) & other...
Back in the 90s, a researcher & journalist named Frederick Clarkson noticed that Christian Reconstructionist ideas were spreading to charismatics...
Well, here's one of those - see the subsection of this long 1994 article, towards the end, titled "No longer without Sheep": https://t.co/DbEwgHfxzl
They were always numerically tiny, but no matter - they now have "sheep", millions in fact, weaned on CR-derived visions of...
Now, for the wonkishly-inclined reader, here's a 2011 continuation of Frederick Clarkson's line of thought, from the website Fred & I co-founded in 2005:
"The Rise of Charismatic Dominionism (Updated)": https://t.co/RW0LH4xnYP
One of the most colorful entrances of the NAR, and its brand of Charismatic Dominionism into US national politics was when John McCain picked Sarah Palin as his VP running mate in the 2008 election.
You see, Palin was....
Now, "Assemblies of God" are churches in one of the major Pentecostal denominations. But, as I suggested, one of the...
Wagner & his crowd, for all their magical woo ideas, are surprisingly organizationally & technologically cutting edge.
You wouldn't think that, of a movement
But, I've got footage of C. Peter Wagner giving a lecture, at a big South Korean church in 1993.
Most people...
At the very start of the footage, you'll see somebody in the audience transcribing Wagner's talk, on an *extremely early* laptop that doesn't even seem to have a rollerball or a trackpad.
To give you an example - during the 2016, one evangelical...
Guess who was funding this?..
More from Society
Two things can be true at once:
1. There is an issue with hostility some academics have faced on some issues
2. Another academic who himself uses threats of legal action to bully colleagues into silence is not a good faith champion of the free speech cause
I have kept quiet about Matthew's recent outpourings on here but as my estwhile co-author has now seen fit to portray me as an enabler of oppression I think I have a right to reply. So I will.
I consider Matthew to be a colleague and a friend, and we had a longstanding agreement not to engage in disputes on twitter. I disagree with much in the article @UOzkirimli wrote on his research in @openDemocracy but I strongly support his right to express such critical views
I therefore find it outrageous that Matthew saw fit to bully @openDemocracy with legal threats, seeking it seems to stifle criticism of his own work. Such behaviour is simply wrong, and completely inconsistent with an academic commitment to free speech.
I am not embroiling myself in the various other cases Matt lists because, unlike him, I think attention to the detail matters and I don't have time to research each of these cases in detail.
1. There is an issue with hostility some academics have faced on some issues
2. Another academic who himself uses threats of legal action to bully colleagues into silence is not a good faith champion of the free speech cause
How about Selina Todd, Kathleen Stock, Jo Phoenix, Rachel Ara, Sarah Honeychurch, Michele Moore, Nina Power, Joanna Williams, Jenny Murray, Julia Gasper ...
— Matt Goodwin (@GoodwinMJ) February 17, 2021
Or is it only Eric you pop at?
Are they all making it up too Rob?
Are they "beyond parody"? https://t.co/drQssTD0OL
I have kept quiet about Matthew's recent outpourings on here but as my estwhile co-author has now seen fit to portray me as an enabler of oppression I think I have a right to reply. So I will.
I consider Matthew to be a colleague and a friend, and we had a longstanding agreement not to engage in disputes on twitter. I disagree with much in the article @UOzkirimli wrote on his research in @openDemocracy but I strongly support his right to express such critical views
I therefore find it outrageous that Matthew saw fit to bully @openDemocracy with legal threats, seeking it seems to stifle criticism of his own work. Such behaviour is simply wrong, and completely inconsistent with an academic commitment to free speech.
I am not embroiling myself in the various other cases Matt lists because, unlike him, I think attention to the detail matters and I don't have time to research each of these cases in detail.