This is an interesting review and a good intro to new municipalism (or what @davidjmadden calls 'socialist municipalism')

But it misses some key aspects of what makes the movement distinctive, and distinct from London's municipal socialism.
So here’s a thread on municipalism...

Municipalism is not simply “a political stance as well as an approach to shaping the built environment” (as @davidjmadden puts it) – it’s a distinctive strategic approach to democratising the local state and transforming urban economies using urban spaces as a platform…
1/
Municipalism adopts a ‘dual power’ strategy: 1) supporting commons and practices of commoning through which a more democratic, cooperative (and potentially prefiguratively postcapitalist) ‘solidarity economy’ can be instituted;
2/
...and 2) seeking to take hold of the political institutions of the local state through mobilising social movements for winning electoral office, to reimagine and transform the state from within, through guerrilla occupation of bureaucracies, in order to support 1) above.
3/
Means and ends are intertwined in a prefigurative politics that ‘feminises’ the state’s decision-making processes and subverts technocratic managerialism in favour of 'collective theory-building' and open-source, crowdsourced deliberative-democratic policy-making.
4/
Municipalism thus represents a departure from recent conventional modes of social movement organising – from ‘occupying the squares’ to ‘occupying the institutions’; working in against and beyond the state.
5/
This means reimagining traditional political parties as movement-led citizen platforms, energised by a ‘confluence’ of social forces in response to urban crisis and austerity urbanism, united across cultural differences around a shared commitment/interest in urban inhabitance.
6/
As such, it represents a challenge to the authority of the nation-state and its abstract notions of citizenship, in welcoming all who live in a city (regardless of national identity, including refugees and migrants) as citizens with a ‘right to the city’ based on inhabitance.
7/
Municipalism sees the nation-state as primarily the instrument of nationalism and capitalism (as one of capital's fundamental abstract social forms, alongside money and property) and thus turns towards ‘the urban’ as a more promising locus for anti-capitalist action.
8/
(there are obviously huge contradictions in this - whether 'socialism in one country' or 'municipalism in one city' is at all sustainable within, let alone transformable of, global capitalism... but that's another story)
9/
An important aspect of municipalism is trans-local organising and international cooperation, knowledge sharing and trading through 'solidarity markets' between municipalist platforms in different cities, to create networks (like Fearless Cities) capable of resisting attack.
10/
In sum: ‘the urban’ is not to be conflated with local government, which is seen as just another (albeit very powerful) institutional tool in a multi-scalar political strategy aiming to challenge the capitalist state.
11/
So this is not just about mimicking and relocating a (democratic-socialist) national state politics to the local/city level, through a “commitment to the provision of housing, infrastructure, and public space for all” (as @davidjmadden does indeed also suggest)...
12/
…It’s about starting with a ‘politics of proximity’ that only the urban scale can provide as the basis for organising spaces of solidarity and developing new popular institutions for political/economic democracy, like mutual aid societies, co-ops, social centres, assemblies.
13/
Ultimately, municipalism is about cultivating more democratic, cooperative and solidary subjectivities and social relations through these urban-institutional spaces, which enable social encounter, collective joy, popular education, knowledge sharing and movement-building.
14/
There's some great work out there recently published on these different aspects; all open access...

@alterurbanist's take on Fearless Cities and new municipalism as moving beyond the 'local trap' (in @antipodeonline): https://t.co/QFs7PRP3hH
15/
@LauCRoth, Irene Zugasti & Alejandra de Diego Baciero's
work (@rosalux_global) on the centrally important practice of feminising politics: https://t.co/a3Hu8qzvQt
16/
@vrupu's study of the Spanish confluences, the birthplace of new municipalism (also published by @rosalux_global):
https://t.co/y2aCmeyKNC
17/
...and my own paper on differentiating different 'models' of new municipalism, situated in their historical and political-economic contexts (@ProgHumGeog):
https://t.co/qL17JkkwZ3
18/

More from Society

You May Also Like

🌺श्री गरुड़ पुराण - संक्षिप्त वर्णन🌺

हिन्दु धर्म के 18 पुराणों में से एक गरुड़ पुराण का हिन्दु धर्म में बड़ा महत्व है। गरुड़ पुराण में मृत्यु के बाद सद्गती की व्याख्या मिलती है। इस पुराण के अधिष्ठातृ देव भगवान विष्णु हैं, इसलिए ये वैष्णव पुराण है।


गरुड़ पुराण के अनुसार हमारे कर्मों का फल हमें हमारे जीवन-काल में तो मिलता ही है परंतु मृत्यु के बाद भी अच्छे बुरे कार्यों का उनके अनुसार फल मिलता है। इस कारण इस पुराण में निहित ज्ञान को प्राप्त करने के लिए घर के किसी सदस्य की मृत्यु के बाद का समय निर्धारित किया गया है...

..ताकि उस समय हम जीवन-मरण से जुड़े सभी सत्य जान सकें और मृत्यु के कारण बिछडने वाले सदस्य का दुख कम हो सके।
गरुड़ पुराण में विष्णु की भक्ति व अवतारों का विस्तार से उसी प्रकार वर्णन मिलता है जिस प्रकार भगवत पुराण में।आरम्भ में मनु से सृष्टि की उत्पत्ति,ध्रुव चरित्र की कथा मिलती है।


तदुपरांत सुर्य व चंद्र ग्रहों के मंत्र, शिव-पार्वती मंत्र,इन्द्र सम्बंधित मंत्र,सरस्वती मंत्र और नौ शक्तियों के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया है।
इस पुराण में उन्नीस हज़ार श्लोक बताए जाते हैं और इसे दो भागों में कहा जाता है।
प्रथम भाग में विष्णुभक्ति और पूजा विधियों का उल्लेख है।

मृत्यु के उपरांत गरुड़ पुराण के श्रवण का प्रावधान है ।
पुराण के द्वितीय भाग में 'प्रेतकल्प' का विस्तार से वर्णन और नरकों में जीव के पड़ने का वृत्तांत मिलता है। मरने के बाद मनुष्य की क्या गति होती है, उसका किस प्रकार की योनियों में जन्म होता है, प्रेत योनि से मुक्ति के उपाय...
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?