A lot of FPL managers have sent in their questions regarding a differential striker this week as they see this as a way to make up some points over the condensed fixture schedule...
The Review: GW 12 - A thread
Hi everyone, welcome to the latest edition of “The Review” where I analyze the Premier League football played at the weekend:
#FPL #FPLCommunity @OfficialFPL
(Data taken from @FFScout and @FFH_HQ with consent)
A lot of FPL managers have sent in their questions regarding a differential striker this week as they see this as a way to make up some points over the condensed fixture schedule...
Mins per shot inside the box: 39.1 vs 40 vs 57.5 vs 52
Mins per big chance: 81.8 vs 108.5 vs 172.5 vs 105
Mins per big chance created: 900 vs 760 vs 172.5 vs 941
xG: 5.72 vs 4.5 vs 3.62 vs 3.63
This is the most popular dilemma of the week. With the Portuguese now confirmed to be sidelined for at least six to eight weeks, it is time to look for a replacement. Here I look at the options in detail:
Mins per shot inside the box: 35.6 vs 49.9 vs 60 vs 41.5 vs 58.7
Mins per big chance: 127.3 vs 249.3 vs 216 vs 415 vs 274
Mins per big chance created: 297 vs 332.3 vs 1080 vs 415 vs 411
Another big haul at the weekend saw Vardy register his fourth double digit return of the season, which also saw Leicester jump to the top for xG over the last six GWs. Let's take a deep dive and see whether...
Leicester (GW 1-6) vs Leicester (GW 7-12)
Shots inside the box per game: 6.16 vs 8.67
Big chances per game: 2 vs 2.67
Chances created per game: 5.5 vs 8.33
Mins per shot inside the box: 42.7 vs 35.7
Mins per big chance: 48.1 vs 66.9
Mins per big chance created: 385 vs 267.5
By looking at the stats, it can be seen that the improvement in Leicester’s numbers...
Let's take a look into how have Leeds performed defensively in recent GWs compared to the start of the season:
Shots inside the box conceded per game: 8.9 vs 13.7
Big chances conceded: 3 vs 4
Leeds have looked tired of late and have started allowing the opposition to swarm their box. Over the span of last three GWs, Leeds have also...
A disappointing performance in attack saw Chelsea lose out to Everton over the weekend. This loss also saw Werner fail to manage even a single shot on target. Last week I pointed out that the loss of Ziyech had not had a direct impact...
Werner (GW 7-10) vs Werner (GW11) vs Werner (GW12)
Mins per shot inside the box: 46.7 vs 22.5 vs 90
Mins per big chance: 65.4 vs 45 vs 90
Mins per big chance created: 327 vs 90 vs 90
With a decent run of fixtures coming up in the festive season (BHA new SOU tot bur) it might be worth looking at the differential assets which Fulham offer. Let's take a look at how Fulham have been faring in the...
Fulham (GW 1-8) vs Fulham (GW 9-12)
Shots inside the box per game: 7.13 vs 6
Big chances per game: 1.38 vs 3
Chances created per game: 9.5 vs 8.25
Cavaleiro vs Lookman vs Reid
Mins per shot inside the box: 78.9 vs 61.6 vs 70
Mins per big chance: 157.8 vs 246.3 vs 175
Mins per big chance created: 789 vs 246.3 vs 700
With four clean sheets on the trot, Man City are starting to shape up as the team they were in the previous seasons. Let's take a look at how much Man City have improved since the start of the season:
Shots inside the box conceded per game: 7.57 vs 4
Big chances conceded per game: 2.14 vs 0.5
As we can see above there has been a huge improvement in the back line for Man City, these improvements...
Mins per touches in the final third: 2.88 vs 37.6 vs 45
Mins per shots inside the box: 630 vs 131.7 vs 360
Mins per big chance: 630 vs 395 vs 360
Mins per big chance created: 630 vs 790 vs 360
Mins per chance created: 37.1 vs 790 vs 360
Over the last six GWs both Liverpool and Chelsea have been in the top four for shots conceded inside the box and over the same duration Chelsea have been the best in the league for...
Mins per big chance: 802 vs 903 vs 540 vs 782
Mins per shot inside the box: 100.25 vs 301 vs 180 vs 782
Mins per chance created: 61.7 vs 64.5 vs 60 vs 55.85
Mins per touches inside the final third: 3.13 vs 3.33 vs 2.83 vs 2.66
Given that the new gameweek is beginning only a couple of days after the last one ended, it raises questions about which players might get rested or whether or not a full strength team will be playing on the pitch...
De Bruyne vs Fernandes (this season)
Mins per shot inside the box: 43.8 vs 68.1
Mins per big chance: 138.7 vs 126.4
Mins per big chance created: 104 vs 110.6
Mins per chance created: 26.8 vs 23.9
With five GWs scheduled in the next 17 days, the element of rotation comes into play which is tough to tackle with just one free transfer every week...
If you are looking to follow more of my content, follow me at:
Twitter: https://t.co/oBvQzf7Dor
Instagram: https://t.co/1tZ92vBXIT
YouTube: https://t.co/mDw5fLXaAG
Thank you so much for supporting my content!
More from AbuBakar Siddiq
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.

4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
1/Politics thread time.
To me, the most important aspect of the 2018 midterms wasn't even about partisan control, but about democracy and voting rights. That's the real battle.
2/The good news: It's now an issue that everyone's talking about, and that everyone cares about.
3/More good news: Florida's proposition to give felons voting rights won. But it didn't just win - it won with substantial support from Republican voters.
That suggests there is still SOME grassroots support for democracy that transcends
4/Yet more good news: Michigan made it easier to vote. Again, by plebiscite, showing broad support for voting rights as an
5/OK, now the bad news.
We seem to have accepted electoral dysfunction in Florida as a permanent thing. The 2000 election has never really
To me, the most important aspect of the 2018 midterms wasn't even about partisan control, but about democracy and voting rights. That's the real battle.
2/The good news: It's now an issue that everyone's talking about, and that everyone cares about.
3/More good news: Florida's proposition to give felons voting rights won. But it didn't just win - it won with substantial support from Republican voters.
That suggests there is still SOME grassroots support for democracy that transcends
4/Yet more good news: Michigan made it easier to vote. Again, by plebiscite, showing broad support for voting rights as an
5/OK, now the bad news.
We seem to have accepted electoral dysfunction in Florida as a permanent thing. The 2000 election has never really
Bad ballot design led to a lot of undervotes for Bill Nelson in Broward Co., possibly even enough to cost him his Senate seat. They do appear to be real undervotes, though, instead of tabulation errors. He doesn't really seem to have a path to victory. https://t.co/utUhY2KTaR
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 16, 2018