This is a thread on statistics in science: 1/7 (via @LogicofScience)

Basic
Statistics Part 1: The Law of Large Numbers https://t.co/wUH8eAAIak

#Science #Statistics

Basic Statistics Part 2: Correlation vs. Causation

https://t.co/Azhyl8pDsX (2/7)
Basic Statistics Part 3: The Dangers of Large Data Sets: A Tale of P values, Error Rates, and Bonferroni Corrections

https://t.co/LetN6aEBRM (3/7)
Basic statistics part 4: understanding P values

https://t.co/K8MMMgTCOf (4/7)
Basic Statistics Part 5: Means vs Medians, Is the “Average” Reliable?

https://t.co/xDdsknlZyt
(5/7)
Basic Statistics Part 6: Confounding Factors and Experimental Design

https://t.co/yGxTh2HPf9 (6/7)
When can correlation equal causation?

https://t.co/Vl3JmC8NMe (7/7)
While you are here, also have a look at this thread on rules of logic:

https://t.co/OtVrL0nyIl
Thanks for your patience.

May be mark this thread too for reading later? One on logical fallacies: https://t.co/Z7S9kNsFoI

-End-

More from Science

You May Also Like

The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW
1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.

Please add your own.

2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you


3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.

“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”

“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”

4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:

“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”

“What’s end-game here?”

“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”

5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:

“What would the best version of yourself do”?