1/n
SSB Scam: Here are the evidences to show as to the involvement of senior officers in this Scam since so many years. The concerned GTO wrote to the Comdt pointing out the illegality and favouritism. Comdt didn't do anything since it was the case of the son of DG Recruiting.

2/n
Having failed to get any positive response from the Comdt, Selection Centre, the GTO then wrote to the then COAS, Gen Dalbir Singh bringing out the impropriety on the part of all concerned including the DG Recruiting whose own son was being favoured for TA Entry.
3/n
The COAS responded through his AG who assured that necessary corrective actions were being taken but he didn't stop the entry of the son of the DG Recruiting who was getting favoured. The AG offered to meet the GTO at Allahabad & then met him also the very next day there.
4/n
Astonished to see the award of PVSM to the said DG Recruiting inspite of a clear cut charge of fraud against him, the GTO again wrote to the COAS questioning the award of PVSM. However, neither any reply was ever received nor the illegal entrant was stopped from joining TA..
5/n
The GTO didn't stop here. He then sent an email to the new COAS, Gen Bipin Rawat (now CDS) about it.The result,the GTO was threatened. Fed up with continuous attempts of the senior officers to hush up the matter, the GTO resigned & his resignation was accepted within no time.
n/n
CBI has now taken formal cognizance of this matter & has reportedly sought the permission of all concerned, under Sec 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to proceed with this matter. The said illegal entrant continues to serve & is a Major at present in a TA Unit.
@adgpi @DefenceMinIndia @rajnathsingh @SpokespersonMoD @ETDefence @rajatpTOI @ShivAroor @gauravcsawant @PMOIndia @narendramodi

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.