#SAIL - SAIL Multi-year multiple Breakouts - BULL RUN AHEAD - TradingView -
More from TradingView India 🇮🇳
More from Sail
SAIL - If I say Sail can do 65-70 in worst case how many hearts will break? 🤪
105 is key, Bulls might defend for the time being. Once they fail during any downtrend Boy Bulls will be in serious trouble.
First targets 90-95 and worst case 65-70 (This i wil review later) https://t.co/RYaMwRQb7e
105 is key, Bulls might defend for the time being. Once they fail during any downtrend Boy Bulls will be in serious trouble.
First targets 90-95 and worst case 65-70 (This i wil review later) https://t.co/RYaMwRQb7e
Angle 2 -- On Log scale its end of this upmove from March 2020.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 24, 2021
No major support until 90-92.
Conclusion - any rise to 123-128 is a sell opportunity
Bullish only above 145. Personally not bulish.
Potential taregts on downside are 105-90#SAIL pic.twitter.com/yZv2WXwIMU
#SRF any similarity in chart pattern!? 🧐 Remember, this was my trigger from list of 3 stocks in watchlist.
Today, don't ask me for new watchlist - I will be mostly 'Watching' 😏 https://t.co/0BeDHtB55r
Today, don't ask me for new watchlist - I will be mostly 'Watching' 😏 https://t.co/0BeDHtB55r
#SAIL Directionally it is headed to 140/150 levels next over short period of time. SL - todays low pic.twitter.com/1IE4eJn9px
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) April 13, 2021
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".