#Rolexrings
I'll go with 5th is getting done soon.
There is one more possibility that 3rd wave is sub-dividing !!
IF so it must hold last rise #retracement https://t.co/a6BBHIWrZk
ROLEX RINGS
— manav (@manav1418) June 24, 2022
Elliot counts (possible scenario's)
Which wave count is correct as per you\U0001f64f
please guide....!!@nakulvibhor @nishkumar1977 @JustNifty @piyushchaudhry @KrunallThakkar pic.twitter.com/h97J8Ycuf5
More from Van ilango (JustNifty)
Holding 660 & 680, poised for big run in the days, weeks & months ahead.
Volume goes with rises
Thank you.\U0001f64f
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) August 18, 2021
A fresh input for you. #McDowell
A major triangle break out in the coming months.
Presently poised to move out of recent consolidation pic.twitter.com/J15F06ODUq
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]