@RyanDriehuys @joerogan In April 2018 NeonRevolt presented a piece where he named Michael Anton as possibly

@SSBN654_Q @RyanDriehuys @joerogan I found some supporting evidence in this video recording of a lecture by Michael Anton.

From 45:00:
"Too many conservatives say: can we take that principle? No limits on acquisition nor on property rights can be ever set at all because it is a principle."
https://t.co/YurIAQsj9R
@SSBN654_Q @RyanDriehuys @joerogan So Anton made a case for reasonably limiting acquisition and property rights. IMO important and easily overlooked.

Like Q said:

"Wealth (over generations) buys power.
Power (over generations) buys more wealth and control.
More wealth and control buys countries and its people."
@SSBN654_Q @RyanDriehuys @joerogan As @GAP_Great wrote:

"It makes complete sense to limit wealth.

I am a capitalist, but what I call a small market capitalist.
Monopolies, global companies, financial arbitrage, large government agencies, large religious institutions, and royalty are all verboten."
@SSBN654_Q @RyanDriehuys @joerogan @GAP_Great And @MartinGeddis put it succinctly:

'Property rights also protect the proceeds of crime;
so they become "crime rights".

Hence limiting societal ruin risk is OK.'

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW