Categories Politics

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
Four days left to turn out voters in the most pivotal election of our lifetimes.

Plug in this weekend to the GOTV efforts of our incredible @OnwardTogether partners.

A thread:

.@Alliance4Youth is organizing the early youth vote. Early turnout among younger people is already strong—help the Alliance keep it going by joining their outreach this weekend.


Check off your @CareInActionUS to-do list:

If you need to return a mail-in ballot: drop it off at a dropbox or your elections office.

If you need to vote in person, DM @CareInActionUS to make a plan.

If you’ve already voted by mail, track your ballot:

If you're a voter in FL, GA, MI, NC, OH, PA, SC, TX, or WI who doesn't have transportation, the @CollectivePAC's #VoteToLive campaign has partnered with @lyft to provide $30 account credits for rides to & from the polls.


Follow @ivotefund and share their information on voting early with your friends and family.

Then, join them in the long-term fight to expand voter access.
Yes, I have seen the thing about Texas suing other states over the election. Yes, the US Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over cases between states.

No, this is not a thing that will change the election. At all.

If this is real - and I do emphasize the if - it is posturing by the elected Republican "leadership" of Texas in an attempt to pander to a base that has degraded from merely deplorable to utterly despicable.

Apparently, it is real. For a given definition of real, anyway. As Steve notes, the Texas Solicitor General - that's the lawyer who is supposed to represent the state in cases like this - has noped out and the AG is counsel of


Although - again - I'm curious as to the source. I'm seeing no press release on the Texas AG's site; I'm wondering if this might not be a document released by whoever the "special counsel" to the AG is - strange situation.

Doesn't matter. The Supreme Court is Supremely Unlikely to take this case - their jurisdiction is exclusive, but it's also discretionary.

Meaning, for nonlawyers:
SCOTUS is the only place where one state can sue another, but SCOTUS can and often does decline to take the case.
Strongly desirable, but 0% likelihood IMO

I'd love for the President's pardon powers to be restricted to before the election


Very low

I won't put them at zero because you never know what could theoretically happen, but the last amendment was largely accidental and still 28 years ago

The last intentional amendment was ratified 49 years ago


No

People shouldn't end up with fewer rights by banding together, that's just


Don't know the precise verbiage, but it would require the Wyoming Rule for House seats and expand the Senate to 3 Senators per


Yes: that's the purpose of the House, and the # of electoral votes for President being rooted in the